Wikileaks: DNC Voicemails

WikiLeaks has released hacked audio recordings of Democratic National Committee voicemails.

Going to be quite the night down there in Philly.

32 Replies to “Wikileaks: DNC Voicemails”

  1. Only invest in beer and popcorn after you’ve taken out a lot of stock in heavy metals (steel, brass, lead) and powdered sustenance (milk, potatoes, and smokeless powder). it’s going to be quite a party so load up and be prepared.

  2. From here until November, how much money will the Democrats raise when most Democrat donors think their private and secure data isn’t actually private and secure?

  3. I listened to some via the link in The Daily Beast article, and they are mostly pretty mundane, although the caller in message 16460 is pretty emphatic in her dislike of Bernie Samders.

  4. One government for sale, for a pretty penny, one government for sale!
    Government hustlers ‘working for the little people’, but first they take a rather hefty cut FOR THEMSELVES.
    “Working for the little people”…well not in our lifetime.
    Cheers
    Hans Rupprecht, Commander in Chief
    1st Saint Nicolaas Army
    Army Group “True North”

  5. Do not worry. Hillary Clinton’s private Email was totally secure. There is no way Russia could ever have hacked her slap dash insecure system while it sat in the basement at Chappaqua. Having the Secret Service on guard at the house would keep those Russky Hackers out. Same with the Chinese, British, French, Iranians, Israelis, Japanese, and dozen of other countries.
    None of them stole her Emails!
    All is Well!
    All is Well!!!

  6. Peace and love, hope and change, caviar and Dom. Never before has the arrogance and privilege if the left been on such full display. May we all remember Philly as the tipping point.

  7. Something I recently came across that kinda says it all-
    Mathematics:
    (This comes from 2 math teachers with a combined total of 70 yrs. experience.)
    It has an indisputable mathematical logic. It also made me Laugh Out Loud.
    This is a strictly …. mathematical viewpoint… and it goes like this:
    What Makes 100%?
    What does it mean to give MORE than 100%?
    Ever wonder about those people who say they are giving more than 100%? We have all been to those meetings where someone wants you to give over 100%.
    How about achieving 103%?
    What makes up 100% in life?
    Here’s a little mathematical formula that might help you answer these questions:
    If:
    A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
    Is represented as:
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26.
    Then:
    H-A-R-D-W-O-R-K
    8+1+18+4+23+15+18+11 = 98%
    And
    K-N-O-W-L-E-D-G-E
    11+14+15+23+12+5+4+7+5 = 96%
    But,
    A-T-T-I-T-U-D-E
    1+20+20+9+20+21+4+5 = 100%
    And,
    B-U-L-L-S-H-I-T
    2+21+12+12+19+8+9+20 = 103%
    AND, look how far ass kissing will take you:
    A-S-S-K-I-S-S-I-N-G
    1+19+19+11+9+19+19+9+14+7 = 118%
    So, one can conclude with mathematical certainty, that while Hard Work and Knowledge will get you close, and Attitude will get you there, it’s the Bullshit and Ass Kissing that will put you over the top.
    Now you know why some people are where they are!
    ….Hmmmm….

  8. Indeed all is well…I heard Dear Bill gave a lovely message on his Wonderful Life with Hillary (no mention of his Other Ladies)…and Michelle’s speech was so Wonderful…she should be President!
    The masses are deluded.

  9. So let me get this right. People are paying megabucks to sniff and lick crooks’ and dummies’ arseholes?
    Ladies and Gentlemen! Line right up! Tonight only! A quarter of a million gets ya an Obammy crotch whiff …and for only 200 Gs, a long lingerin’ lick of Slick Willy’s Reject!

  10. Congratulations for finally discovering what old-school left-wing academics, writers, and activists have been railing against for years: the role of money in US politics, on both sides of the aisle. Better late to the party than never, I guess.
    Remember the 2010 US Supreme Court’s ruling in Citizen’s United vs FEC? Remember the ongoing (and conservative-led) campaign to further dismantle federal campaign finance laws?
    You could have opposed these things then. Heck, you can still decide to oppose them now. Just know that if you do, you’ll be joining a progressive cause.
    You’re welcome!

  11. Any breakfast without bacon is completely fcked up.
    Let’s get a petition that makes it a law … but more teeth than most laws … make it like the law of gravity … if you don’t understand it … you die.

  12. Don’t you know? Right wing/conservative corruption is bad, but liberal/leftist/progressive/socialist/communist corruption is good and necessary.

  13. Conversations at a $200,000 dollar private dinner with Hillary and present obama-
    “That stupid Putin is helping Donald Trump by publishing our names and addresses.”
    “Give me some more of that delicious Russian caviar with scrambled eggs.”

    Tonight we get to hear from the ‘Benghazi Butcher’ and how she fumbled the ball.

  14. I bet it is the NSA as source. Just like Petreus’s love notes were released.

  15. so tell us kt, john, rizzwan, what the eff does any of that have to do with the E-mail content?

  16. I bet it is the NSA-
    ***************
    My thoughts also.
    We should not be surprised if Assange still has several friends at NSA giving/selling him anything he needs.
    Some of these recordings are still warm.
    Hillary pissed off the wrong people.

  17. Oh- and I forgot- The FBI is investigating the leaks ? ha.
    Hillary and present Obathroom pissed off many of them also.
    FBI Comey wanted to indict Hillary this -“- much, but Obathroom gave them marching orders..
    Comey still called her a liar, and said if anyone else had done what she did they would go to jail.

  18. “Wikileaks appears to have gone insane.”
    That subject line from your Wired link says it all.
    The same mindset that idolized Julian Assange is now acting like a jilted lover:
    “Julian, how could you do this to us?”

  19. “I bet it is the NSA as source.”
    C’mon now, this is starting to get really silly. The source could be practically anyone. It might not even be a hacker at all. What about a disenchanted pro-Bernie DNC IT-support techie? Getting everyone in a lather over putative Russian hackers would provide the perfect cover.
    It is worth remembering that despite all the noise about “hacking”, a tremendous quantity of WikiLeaks’ material is obtained the good old-fashioned espionage way: by outright theft, i.e., by having someone inside the system simply download it and send it to them (or have we already forgotten PFC Bradley, er, Chelsea Manning?).
    I have to admit though that all the conspiracy-theory stuff is Hillarious, er, hilarious, coming as it does from Democrats who ought to know better than risk exposing themselves as tinfoil-hatted loons!

  20. The most surprising thing here is that ABC is actually reporting on the content! Not the alleged hacking by a foreign power

Navigation