Institutionalizing Intolerance

[T]he bloodbaths of the last century were made far easier by the labelling of opposition to them as incitement, propaganda and promotion. This enabled evil regimes to jail or execute those who might have stood up to their actions.
Hitler was able to get away with his Holocaust, and Mao, Stalin, Amin and others with theirs, because they had first silenced their opponents by declaring their thoughts too dangerous to be spoken in public.
Any arbitrary power given to governments or courts today to shield good people from bad thoughts will one day be used by governments and courts to protect bad thoughts from good people.

I’ll go a step further than Lorne Gunter – the insidious crawl of what is euphamistically termed “political correctness” is taking on troubling aspects of history repeating itself, this time cloaked in a seductive charade of post-modern “tolerance”. It is anything but.
Suppression of criticism has intrenched itself in our legal systems, most notably through the back door of the extra-legal and left-loaded Human Rights Commissions. Appointed courts are replacing parliamentary debate with judicial decree while engaging in an orgy of publication bans.
A government, with the complicity of an enabling media, has seeded the astonishingly dangerous belief that elections are such an expensive and troublesome ordeal that it is preferable to allow a party under investigation for corruption, that has lost the confidence of parliament, to remain in control of the treasury, the legal system, and the military.
The “elections are unpleasant” message is becoming so pervasive that one left-wing MP recently argued that poll results should stand in lieu of calling a by-election to fill a vacant seat.
A sitting minority government has successfully established precedent by refusing to recognize its own fall from loss of confidence. The office of the Prime MInister is now so powerful as to be legitimately compared to a dictatorship. The machinery is in place. The only ingredient missing to complete the cycle of history is a charismatic leader from the hard “politically correct” left, with the power of a majority.

57 Replies to “Institutionalizing Intolerance”

  1. Dont forget their very own police force!
    LCMP!
    The situation is intolerable yet Ontario tolerates it.

  2. Why do you also think they align themselves with minorities. Someone has to do the dirty work when all hell breaks loss.

  3. An excellent post Kate,
    In younger members of the New Left, especially on university campuses, there is a true appetite for violence to achieve they’re goals. They have been raised and educated that free speech is ‘liberal’ speech and anyone who disagrees with them is a hate monger. Paul Martin is not a hard leftist, just a pathetic shell of a man who did not have the courage of his convictions.
    But what of a Michael Ignatieff type? He is New Left, but also a hawk who favours increasing our military?
    Now that the New Left has succeeded in re-creating Canada in their image, I’m sure we will see a more increased willingess for them to fight and defend it…even internally. Witness even Jack Layton’s approval of the harsh tone of the military General on the War on Terror.

  4. Excellent post. I’m reminded of Jacques Chirac and others, who, after a resounding ‘Non!’ vote to the European Constitution, were quick to wave the results of the vote off.
    They said, publicly, that the vote was immaterial- and that the Constitution would be adopted, regardless of how the vote went.
    They publicly stated that they, and not the ‘people,’ understood the matter at hand- and that they- and not the ‘people,’ were the only ones capable of making decisions affecting the welfare of the state.
    History, redux?

  5. Sorry for the double post but…
    There is a film that came out a year ago called The Take by Naomi Klien and Avi Lewis. The film advocates for the use of violence and seige to take away private business’ and property for the sake of ‘equality’. They call it the ‘New Democracy’.
    It is very popular among young people and several friends of mine adhere to its philosophy.
    It was also paid for using Canadian tax dollars.

  6. The War Room – you’ve got to be bloody kidding. Is this what the left has become? They have no idea what their up against, with some of us, if they initiate violence.

  7. An all to true and lucid assessment of “political correctness” Kate. Let’s drop the intellectualizing and call it what it is…Stalinist Cultural/global politics. PC is the velvet glove over the iron fist of forced/coerced political conformity.

  8. Since it is Ontario that keeps this corrupt government in power against the wishes of the West, then Ontario should be left with a Canada that does not include the West. Ontario believes in a Liberal dictatorship, the West does not. Only by going on its own will the West be freed from a smothering, unaccountable Liberal government that refuses to recognize any limit on its power.
    Today, the case for Canada may be as weak as the case for Czechoslovakia. Is there any shared vision that unites this nation any more? The Liberals have tried to glue it all together with anti-Americanism, which works in Ontario but isn’t working in Alberta. An amicable divorce allowed the Czech Republic and Slovakia, two nations with irreconcilable values, to thrive on their own.
    Maybe our time has come. This marriage ain’t working!

  9. There is no surprise in the kleptocracy reviving the military. They beat it down and emasculated it in order to rebuild it to their requirements. When they build it back up the military will be grateful to them, the same as Canadians are grateful to the Libs for restoring funding to the health system. With the Media, the Senate, the judiciary and the RCMP under their control the only possible opposition left was the Armed Forces. The new recruits will be properly indoctrinated to support a “liberal” Canada and the coup will be complete. The Armed Forces will increase its presence in Alberta and thereby solidify control over the province if necessary. Too much coffee this morning.

  10. Update: PM PM has stated “we are at war”. “They”, the enemy without, is/are the enemy; accordingly “we”, the regime, must act to protect “our people”. The question will be: Are you with us or against us? If you are not with us, then, you are against us. Who will dare to dissent?
    The following was originally posted 13 July, 2005.
    Librano$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
    Will the Librano$$$$$$$$$$$$$ declare a state of emergency in Canada soon? Will there ever be another federal election in Canada again? Fantastic imaginings? Not so; read any history?
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    Feds plan for possible terror attack during national election campaign
    OTTAWA (CP) – Federal officials have drafted contingency plans for a grim scenario – the disruption of a national election by a terrorist strike on Canadian soil.
    cnews
    “Feds” means AdScam Martin’s socialist regime. Notice the black words: “a grim scenario”. Black deeds to follow by the Librano$$$$$$$$$$$$$
    Posted by maz2 at July 13, 2005 07:02 PM

  11. Just read up on this flake Naomi Klein and she ain’t nothing, period. However, here definition of the new left seems to be taking hold, especially in Toronto. Her parents were, as they call it, American Marxists. A flake like this needs to spend sum time in Darfur so she can see what’s she’s trying to create.
    http://www.commondreams.org/views/092300-103.htm

  12. I was pooh-poohed as too cynical when I expressed suspicion at Gen. Hillier’s language – that he had been let off his leash for political advantage by a Liberal Party worried about erosion of support to the right.
    In view of the Toronto Star’s endorsements, I’m even more convinced the tough talk has more to do with that, than with any sudden awakening to the dangers of Islamofascism.

  13. http://allafrica.com/stories/200507140144.html
    > In a report published in September, Transparency International (TI), a Berlin-based nongovernmental organization established to expose and prevent corruption, named Nigeria as the world’s most corrupt country among 90 nations assessed for their levels of administrative probity. The five Nordic countries, led by Finland, along with Singapore, New Zealand, and Canada, were ranked the eight cleanest national administrative environments. The U.S. was ranked 14th.
    When was Adscam made public? April, 2005 or so? What about the latest non-election in Canada?
    Does anyone really think Canada deserves #8?
    Just curious.

  14. “The only ingredient missing to complete the cycle of history is a charismatic leader from the hard “politically correct” left, with the power of a majority”
    Kate,
    Do you mean Sasha Trudeau?

  15. Very interesting post Kate. Very timely.
    I also agree with rebarbarian.
    I’ll cut to the chase. The real problem is not the Liberal Party of Canada. They, like certain intellectuals, media owners, corporations and bureaucracies, are doing what they’re told. They are bought and paid for pawns. There are a few, maybe one of two actually, at the top of the RCMP who are also bought in my opinion.
    The real enemy however are those behind these foot soldiers. These are the same people who support the United Nations and enact a lot of their policies through the UN. I believe that there are probably less than 200 of them and they control the world.
    The Republicans in the US do not support the UN. This is one reason I side with the Republicans and, as long as they form the government, with America.
    I’ve been concerned about the Canadian armed forces for a few years. Now that Gen. Hillier is popping up and making these announcements about getting tough I am really concerned. The Liberals said a few months ago that the army had to be able to react to enemy forces inside Canada as well as outside. The Canadian armed forces are being set up to control the enemy “inside Canada”. In my opinion this not only includes terrorists but also anyone who criticizes the Liberal Party.
    Kate is right on in her concerns and so is rebarbarian. I wrote several weeks ago that Alberta would eventually open their southern border and invite the Americans, missiles and all, to come in and set up shop.
    America will not put up with a dictatorship in Canada. Alberta will be the first province who will buck this attempt and they will indeed invite the American army in to help if they need them. America will be only too happy to assist.
    How many soldiers do you think it will take to defend Alberta from Ottawa? The US Army Special Operations Command, 1st Special Forces Group is located in Fort Lewis, WA I believe. I don’t know if they are deployed or not. Size, composition, and leadership of military units varies, but generally a Division consists of about 15,000+ and a Brigade about 4,500+. How many do you think it will take to defend Alberta? How many do you think it will take to take back Canada? How many soldiers in the Canadian army will refuse to fight out of principal? How many people in Ontario will continue to vote for the Liberals when they see this happening and when they see Alberta no longer sending her 18 billion to Ottawa each year?
    There are a lot more Canadians who support America than people realize. These are the same people who want to see a free and strong Canada. I am one of them.

  16. I talk to a lot of soldiers everyday, and the common comment is that they work for the Queen, not Ottawa, that’s what they signed for. I’ll leave it at that….

  17. Wow Kate what a post. The only thing I would add is don’t you think Canada’s case is the predicament of the entire world?
    Look at Europe, judicial decree in America, Venezuela, Zimbabwe, etc. the list goes on. The entire world could be at the mercy of a charasmatic leader and the machinery is in place to give him/her total control.

  18. “institutionalizing Intolerance” – was that not formalized with the passing of C38?
    John & Rob, I hope you’re right about the Canadian soldiers.

  19. John Crittenden-
    Please! Americans would much rather see Canadians stand up for themselves. What is there about Canadian society that prevents its people from improving itself?

  20. Mike. “What is there about Canadian society that prevents its people from improving itself?”
    The Liberals. I want to live in a society where people are free to improve themselves. That is not the society the Liberals want.
    They use the 18 billion Alberta gives to Ottawa each year to win votes in Ontario. Take away that 18 billion and you take away many of those votes. If Alberta is not able to do that on its own then they will have to ask for help from someone. That someone will be either England or America. If Manitoba, Saskatchewan and BC stand with Alberta it may be different.
    When you live in a dictatorship where the dictator has taken away your ability to defend yourself, sometimes you have to ask for help.
    I also know a few Canadian soldiers as well as a few RCMP. If Ottawa attempted to use the Canadian armed forces against Canadian citizens they may well be surprised. But the RCMP is different I think. They seem more inclined to do Ottawa’s bidding.

  21. Banned From Babble

    Conservative Blogger Banned From Left-wing BBS for crime of having a differing opinion… First of a series of posts. Click the link to review the entire BBS conversation thread.

  22. Good post, Kate. Whenever the left self-appoints it’s collective self to stifle the free expression of ideas, they consider their actions to be a form of enlightenment, and that they are soldiers in the march of progress. Whenever they achieve power, they manage to institutionalize their own brand of intolerance, always in the name of the common good. But you don’t need a leftist government in order to be able to harvest this force; governments who merely pander to the left find it surprisingly easy to institutionalize that most deeply rooted principle of the left, mob rule.
    When mob rule spreads out into a collective of nods and winks and hand-signals — “this deal is not a deal” — and when public institutions which are historically part of the commons — the public broadcaster, the police — are used to harass and persecute political opponents, the result is the flowering of the left’s historic imperative: “suppression of criticism”, as Gunter put it.
    The most effective criticism is hard evidence — a tape, for example, like the one which has resulted in the shameless persecution of Gurmant Grewal. Ever since it came to light, his life has been turned upside down through a campaign of institutionalized harassment that wouldn’t look out of place in the East Bloc of forty years ago. Our governemnt media will not let him or his family alone, the RCMP investigates “tips” from government supporters, and ordinary citizens collectively back away with a “well, we’ll give them this one” sort of an attitude. Based on the mob wisdom that Mr. Grewal is not a charismatic figure, and that any association with him cannot be good for one’s health or one’s cause, we have chosen to throw him to the leftist dogs of the last century.
    Thank heavens for the blogosphere, and for Kate, because formerly trusted members of the print media have shown themselves to be compromised, appearance by appearance, by their periodic face-time on our government’s national broadcasts. Hubris and power are always on friendly terms, it seems.

  23. To be fair Kate – most of the power that is concentrated in the PMO was done under Cretien’s control. Nobody even noticed it was happening – just the odd small story here and there. I was shocked at the free ride the media gave these little stories – it’s like they were too stupid to see what they were saying. I keep wondering when MSM is going to step up to the plate and actually do the job they are meant to do. The Lib’s have had such an easy go and the whole “unpleasantness” of an election line is soooooooo offence.

  24. EBD above says it very accurately, I believe. EBD, I couldn’t have said it better!
    Oh, man! This is an excellent, thought-provoking thread on an extremely important issue!
    The people above make points worthy of serious consideration. Hell, some comments are going to have me thinking for a while like there’s no tomorrow!
    Extremely well done, Kate!
    There is, at this time, a point I wish to make that popped into mind prior to reading the comments section, so y’all can be assured that this is my own thinking:
    I agree that the current regime in Ottawa and the current Vast, Left-Wing Conspiracy (VLWC) have institutionalized intolerance, namely of all opposition. This is what I’ve been trying to elucidate in many of my previous comments. This is why I tend to go after the Liberal Party and the VLWC with such an intense passion. Take the Ahenakew case. Please (heehee- just kidding). I have long been cognizant of the institutionalization of intolerance. I have seen the blatant, undeniable double standards going on on a daily basis and plainly evident in even the MSM. This is why I have henceforth been more of the opinion of David Matas than Lorne Gunter, though I do also agree, as usual, with Lorne on his POV as well. Why? It’s a matter of fighting back at the institutionalized double standards. For the Ahenakew case, you see, if I, a cacausian, Judeo-Christian male born in Canada, had said the vile horseshit he said, I would definitely be prosecuted. This is why I cheered when he, an aboriginal, was charged and convicted.
    For years I watched helplessly as the state and its allies brutalized ordinary people with their imposed lefto-communist-dictarorial doctrines. I vowed that if someday, somehow, I ever had the means and opportunity to fight back against these evil forces of darkness (Milewski actually used this phrase, except for the “evil”), I would do so with a vengeance built over many years. Along came the internet, the blogosphere, and Kate. SO HERE I AM! I AM A FREE, SOVEREIGN INDIVIDUAL CANADIAN WHO WILL NO LONGER SUBMIT TO “LIBERALISM”, STATISM, MAOISM, STALINISM, BAATHISM, COMMUNISM, LEFTISM OR ANY RELATED EVIL DOCTRINE!
    HEAR ME ROAR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    THIS IS OUR COUNTRY!
    Hey, I feel so free! 🙂

  25. Sheila said:
    “most of the power that is concentrated in the PMO was done under Cretien’s control”
    That is true. However, Martin is only too happy to take advantage of it. So he’s just as bad, as far as I’m concerned.
    Plus, he’s the one who’s now running away from accountability wrt ignoring nonconfidence votes and mulling not keeping his promise wrt timing of the next election.

  26. Richard, I’m happy to do what I can. I think I’ve found a telos for the time being. Once we take back our country from the clutches of the cackling left, who knows what’s next? Of course, so many things will then be better!
    Now y’all see why I’m an optimist! 🙂

  27. Stephen,
    I’m not as optimistic as you. as I’ve stated previously here, PMPM has sniffed power and isn’t going to go without a fight. This is going to get really really nasty before it gets better, so be ready for it.

  28. I agree with rob, on several levels. First, as for the war on terrorism, if anyone thinks that Canada is the least prepared to defend herself against this war please think again. Despite what Gen. Hillier is saying, and despite the support that Martin says he’s giving him, we don’t have an armed forces that could muster enough fighters to fight a successful large forest fire. This is not the fault of our armed forces. It is the fault of the Liberal Pary who have effectively deciminated them. And if the Liberal party believed in a strong Canada to fight terrorism they would not have disarmed its citizens. As in the US and other countries, because our leaders are not prepared to take out the terrorists and their support structure, and, yes, this means millions would die, we are faced with losing our freedoms here at home, not realizing that we will have to fight them sometime anyway. So I’m saying, why not now? What are our leader’s real priorities?
    Then we have the problem of those few rich families who are behind the Liberal Party, the UN and things like Kyoto and the onerous Codex law that is going to stop you from buying your vitamins across the counter. I could go on and on and on, but it’s the same group of enormously rich families and individuals who stand to gain from all of this. Kyoto will do nothing for the environment, it will only make these people richer. Ditto Codex.
    I’m just not sure what to do at this late stage.

  29. Ya’ know it’s kind of a bad sign when the first thing that pops into one’s mind is “take up arms” when posed a question like John’s… Are there really any options beyond that? Are we going to get a charismatic leader to free the west? Really? One could run to the US I suppose but that won’t free the “homeland” though. It would only make it better for the individual that left… So, realistically, what are the options?

  30. Rob, you said:
    “I’m not as optimistic as you. as I’ve stated previously here, PMPM has sniffed power and isn’t going to go without a fight. This is going to get really really nasty before it gets better, so be ready for it.”
    Actually, I agree totally with you. And I’m not being inconsistent at all. I meant that regardless of Mad Man Martin’s relentless grip on power as long as he can maintain it and regardless of the coming worse-than-ever nastiness, I am optimistic wrt the long run. Why? History has demonstrated that tyrants eventually are defeated. If the forces of good have toppled the Evil Empire, the Soviet Union, and Saddam as well as countless others, then I’m going to put it all on the not-so-distant decimation of the Liberal Party of Canada. Believe me, it is going to happen.

  31. John and Richard both raise valid points.
    I do agree with John insofar as if the state in Canada were to fail to protect the citizens from the terrorists. If the terrorists blew up Parliament and the DND HQ, then it is every citizen’s responsibility to take up arms against the enemy. However, I don’t foresee it going this far. After all, despite the anger of the United States at the Canadian left, they will come to the rescue of those of us whom they know to be their true friends, like you and me. Trust me. I understand the Americans as they’ve proven themselves throughout history. And the British as well would come to the aid of the Dominion.
    Richard is also right to be hesitant to take up arms. It is a last-resort scenario, of course. After all, we have a state apparatus and at least some military capability because we want it, regardless of how shitty the state of it all is at the moment.
    Whew, people, perhaps this is one of those moments we should take five, have a drink and enjoy the summer. Then we can get back to the serious stuff. Right?
    Remember, as the saying goes, cooler heads will prevail? And we know we right-thinking people are the cooler heads, right? 🙂

  32. Kate, your statement
    “A government, with the complicity of an enabling media . . . etc. . . . . ” is astonishingly profound.
    It is basically at the root of the rot and corruption that is embodied in the Liberal government.
    Until the mainstream media has a political epiphany in Canada the Libs will prevail.
    Sad but true.

  33. The small size of the Canadian military is not intended to defend against ‘outside’ forces… you have the US for that. It is plenty large and deadly, however, to deal with internal ‘unrest’ with relative ease.

  34. Um, Richard, when I said “taking five” I thought it would be automatically understood that I meant “taking five MINUTES”. Just to reboot the old grey-matter system unit and clear the RAM to boost performance to optimal levels. Then get right back to the important stuff.
    I erred in my judgement in not being unambiguous. My bad.
    But you are right: not working hard and instead kicking back with all those beers as do so many Liberal-voting Canucks (do they get drunk before voting Libby? :-)) is a fundamental problem in today’s Canada. I must confess I’ve been lazy a lot in the past few years. I’m currently trying to improve myself and have recently made huge improvements. If individual apathy is bad, think of the consequences for society as a whole if enough are lazy. Mein gott, that has already happened. Just recall all of our discussions of the longstanding national malaise thanks to mostly eastern voters chug a lugging lagers like there’s no tomorrow!

  35. BTW, I’m an eastern voter, so I can say unflattering stuff about my fellow easterners.
    BTW, I’m more like an Albertan than an easterner, if y’all haven’t yet realized. 🙂

  36. The NYPD is the same size as our forces. I don’t think we’re looking at another ‘war measures act’ scenario. The only saving grace will be Quebec, which will be unforgiving after Gomery, and will terrify the Librano$ who, true to form, will spend the next 9 months throwing money at that province trying to buy votes, only reminding everybody about Adscam all over again. Excellent post, Kate. As somebody posted earlier, Grewal took them on and ostensibly won, but has paid a price for it since. The Tories should be spending the summer door to door teaching Dictatorships For Dummies.

  37. ” I’m more like an Albertan than an easterner”
    Stephen – Doors open dude, if you like tooooo much work. Only condition is that you have to join the separation party, we need one BIG Lever to pry the rest of the country out of there slumber.

  38. Kate, John Crittenden, Rob and some others of you,
    At this point it looks to me like Big Pauli was shaken up by the no-confidence vote.
    He realized conservatives were gaining unexpected momentum. If the puppet-masters hadn’t jerked Belinda’s chain, where would the Liberals be?
    I suspect the hidden hand had to jerk her chain or eventually some US politicians would have spoken publicly about the no-confidence vote. (I was in touch with some senators and congressmen offices during the event.)
    Belinda allowed Big Pauli to drag Liberals back from an unseemly brink. Now phase two is to unleash Hillier in order to take military action and defense issues away from the Conservatives. After all, if Liberals co-opt the defense issue, then a big Conservative card has been eliminated.
    Alberta, some of you want to go it alone, and I would think that’s great if Canada would let you go easily. That’s not going to happen. You are going to need us on that one.
    Klein might have to go. You need to start inviting American military bases up there as has been suggested. You need to start back-channel discussions with us about all this.
    If all these gay issues and other possibilities get established, you’re going to have a vast number of 5th columnists located in Alberta. And this new emphasis on the military by the Liberals could also be an enforcement measure. (Although I have my doubts about how many Canadians would attack other Canadians.)
    Don’t let them surround you. Start the music.

  39. Greg,
    There is a lot here that is not well known by many. A recent visit by one of your Secretaries, I think it was energy, to Fort McMurray was very enlightening for him, and he sees us as an alternative to foreign energy supplies, especially when he found out the reserves were larger then Suadi Arabia at 350 bb’s. The big thing, that doesn’t get public comment is that the Americans own a lot of military real estate here, that is leased to the local DND. As an example, there is a nose dock at Namao that is 100% US owned, and the runway is the 4th alternate for the space shuttle. They were able to build around it under the condition they could have it open with a 30 minute notice.
    So my point is, technically your already here, you just don’t have a solid presence with visible assets. The transition from invisible to visible would be a matter of minutes, not weeks or months.

  40. Scary times indeed… but most people would rather hit the snooze bar and go back to sleep again.
    Good point about the RCMP morphing into a Gestapo, but they’ve been like that for a while now. Just ask any Inuit of a certain age about the mounties being the enforcement arm of the social engineers trying to destroy and “remake” their society in the 50’s on a foundation of dead sled dogs.They’ve already seen the mask slip off.

  41. Just got back from having a barbecue with the family.
    Stephen, I too am optimistic. Canada saved Britain in the early stages of WWII until the Americans got ramped up. Then it didn’t take long to end it did it? I was very young but I can still remember a lot about it. I forget how many tanks, planes and ships Canada delivered to England but it was a hell of a lot.
    And ignacio, remember that the size of the Canada military was at one time large enough to do this. They made Canada proud in two wars. A proud country needs a strong and proud army.
    And you mention cooler heads. I agree again. But Americans have the right to bear arms enshrined in their constitution. Canadians don’t. That is what I don’t like. 200 well armed terrorists could never take over any major city in the US. In Canada it would be a breeze.
    “A government, with the complicity of an enabling media . . . etc. . . . .”. Remember that almost half of Americans also hate their country. That is very apparent to me when I hear Democrats talk. So it isn’t only Canada.
    I understand that the Liberals are having a problem raising funds for the next election. The CPC, on the other hand, are not. That should tell us something.
    And if the Liberals ever took control of Parliament and refused to hold an election the British would be here first. Seriously. We would not even need the Americans. But if we have internal trouble with terrorists and other criminal elements then we may indeed need some help when that time comes. And if there is an external threat of any kind that Canada cannot deal with then you can bet the Americans would be here as quickly as any Premier of any province called them. It’s nice to know that isn’t it?
    Greg, as for Alberta separating from Canada, I don’t think anyone wants that to happen. The firewall is the answer. But the threat of Quebec separation worked for the Liberals for many years. If the threat of Alberta leaving with it’s 19 billion were to appear real to central Canada then the CPC may be seen as the party that could stem that tide. My thoughts anyway.
    Rob, some of what you say I didn’t know. Thanks for enlightening me. The alternate shuttle runway is a new one for me. Cool.
    Let’s take it easy and watch what happens. A big thank you to Kate for providing this blog and for coming up with one good post after another.

  42. BC Con what do ya mean? we say it all the time, if y’all don’t here it, you ain’t been here much. Are y’all really in BC? … must be the coast…

Navigation