[Was the] 92nd anniversary of the start of the Armenian Genocide, marking the day when much of the Armenian intelligentsia in Constantinople was arrested and later killed. Over the next several years, the Ottomans used World War I as cover to kill more than million people. […]
One last point: Never give up your guns.
Most in the West don’t know what happened in that time. Apparently, the Armenians mostly being Christian were slaughtered by the anti-monarchy Marxists that came to power in Istanbul. The Armenians did not want the socialists to assume power and faught against it. Thus, we have similar outcomes to the middle class in much of Europe and especially the Ukraine when the Soviets took power. Same gang same game, same outcome. They are very much still around too.
“And several weeks before deportation orders were given, the Germans — allies of the Turks during the First World War — brought dogs that sniffed out any weapons that Armenians had hidden. Hence, when the deportation orders came, the Armenians of Sivas were incapable of resistance.”
Sweet. I wonder if they’ve ever acknowledged their complicity in genocide #1.
“Our strength consists in our speed and in our brutality. Genghis Khan led millions of women and children to slaughter — with premeditation and a happy heart. History sees in him solely the founder of a state. It’s a matter of indifference to me what a weak western European civilisation will say about me. I have issued the command — and I’ll have anybody who utters but one word of criticism executed by a firing squad — that our war aim does not consist in reaching certain lines, but in the physical destruction of the enemy. Accordingly, I have placed my death-head formation in readiness — for the present only in the East — with orders to them to send to death mercilessly and without compassion, men, women, and children of Polish derivation and language. Only thus shall we gain the living space (Lebensraum) which we need. Who, after all, speaks to-day of the annihilation of the Armenians?”
Adolf Hitler
I forgot to add that they are a NATO country now, on the border of Iraq, so it doesn’t really matter.
Shows what happens whenpeople are disarmed they are easly masscared just look at VT if some had a gun the deaths would,nt have been so large. TYRANY+GUN CONTROL=CARRNAGE
All of the genocides in the post modern era were an event that followed civilian disarmament.
Tyrants are the greatest supporters of gun control you will find.
Harper affirms Cdn position on Armenian Genocide
globalnational.com
MANITOBA — Prime Minister Stephen Harper affirmed Wednesday his belief that 1.5 million Armenians were killed in a ‘Genocide’ nearly a century ago during the First World War. …-
Global’s revisionist propaganda: learned/copied from Stalin-lberia’s methods/tactics.
Only Harper believes the Armenian genocide; just Harper, says Global.
Global says it’s just Harper’s belief; see, it’s just Harper’s belief; just Harper’s belief; just Harper’s; just; see, it didn’t happen. Easy.
But… Khruschev killed lberia. ‘nother lie?
gun control, ” This year willgo down in histroy. For the first time a civilized nation has full gun registration. The streets will be safer,the police more efficent and the world will follow our lead into the future.” ( Adolf Hitler, April 15, 1935.)
gun control, ” This year willgo down in histroy. For the first time a civilized nation has full gun registration. The streets will be safer,the police more efficent and the world will follow our lead into the future.” ( Adolf Hitler, April 15, 1935.)The turks did it in 1911.
Yes, JMorrison…and history teaches us another lesson…governments who register civilian guns do so to aid confiscation.
Goverments who register gun owners, single them out for unjust abuse…this fits the texbook definition of tyranny.
Canada has engaged in this tyranny and uncivil abomination of making a criminal class of innocent civilians through the inversion of property and legal liability status of the holder of a firearms licence. The government made outlaws of anyone who failed to register themselves as a gun owner.
From Lew Rockwell dot com :
“” Gun Control and Genocide
by Gary North
Sunday, April 24th marked the 90th anniversary of the first genocide of the twentieth century: the Turkish government’s slaughter of over a million unarmed Armenians. The key word is “unarmed.”
(…)
It did not pay to be a civilian in the twentieth century. The odds were against you.
BAD NEWS FOR CIVILIANS
The twentieth century, more than any century in recorded history, was the century of man’s inhumanity to man. A memorable phrase, that. But it is misleading. It should be modified: “Governments’ inhumanity to unarmed civilians.” In the case of genocide, however, this is not easily dismissed as collateral damage on a wartime enemy. It is deliberate extermination.
(…)
GUN CONTROL
Lenin disarmed the Russians. Stalin committed genocide against the Kulaks in the 1930s. At least six million died.
The model for 1968 Gun Control Act – even the wording was taken from Hitler’s legislation of 1938, which was a revision of the 1928 law passed by the Weimar government. A good introduction to this politically incorrect history of American gun control is on jpfo.org: Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership.
When Mao’s troops took a village, they would kidnap rich people. They would then offer to return the victims in exchange for money. The victims would be released upon payment. Then they would be kidnapped again. This time, the demand was for guns. Then they would be released again. This made the deal look reasonable to the families of the next victims. But once they had the community’s guns, the mass arrests and executions began.
The idea that the individual has a right of self-defense is written into the U.S. Constitution: the second amendment. Carroll Quigley, who taught Bill Clinton history at Georgetown, was an expert in the history of weaponry. He wrote a 1,000-page book on medieval weaponry. He argued in Tragedy and Hope (1966) that the American Revolution was successful because the Americans possessed weapons that were comparable to those possessed by British troops. This, he said, was why there were a series of revolts against despotic governments in the eighteenth century. When government weapons became superior, the move toward smaller government ceased to be equally successful.
There is a reason why governments are committed to disarming their citizens. They want to maintain the monopoly of violence, no matter what. The idea of an armed citizenry is anathema to most politicians. After all, what’s a monopoly for, if not to be used?
CONCLUSION
Genocide happens.
It doesn’t happen whenever the would-be targets own guns. “”
Genocide is genocide; no matter in which language it is spoken/written/carried out.
Liberal leader Citoyen DionMay’s France has recognized the Turkish genocide.
France now has been charged with complicity in the Rwandan genocide.
Liberal Citoyen DionMay remains silent on the complicity of France in the Rwandan genocide.
…-
Trouble at the L.A. Times: An editor kills a Page One story on Armenian genocide, and charges of bias fly
By Daniel Hernandez
Wednesday, April 25, 2007 – 7:00 pm
Did the Los Angeles Times kill a front-page article about the fight over the recognition of the Armenian genocide because its writer, Mark Arax, is Armenian?
It’s a question L.A. Times managing editor Douglas Frantz would probably prefer not to address.
News broke earlier this week that Frantz killed Arax’s story in a terse email message to the writer because, Frantz said, Arax had “a conflict of interest” and a “position on the issue.” Frantz was referring to a 2005 letter in which Arax, four other Armenian Times staff writers and legal affairs reporter Henry Weinstein reminded the paper’s top editors to refer to the genocide as genocide, in accordance with the paper’s style rules. The 2005 letter had been well-received, acknowledged, and, sources at the paper tell the L.A. Weekly, forgotten.
But in his recent email to Arax, obtained by the Weekly, Frantz characterized the letter as a “petition,” as in some form of activism. He also told Arax that he “went around [the] system” in a bid to land the story assignment, by dealing with an editor in the Times Washington bureau, Robert Ourlian, who is Armenian American.
So Frantz reassigned the story to Washington reporter Rich Simon, who turned around a decorous and somewhat routine take on Turkey’s ongoing mission to block Congress from recognizing the slaughter of more than 1 million Armenians by Ottoman Turkey during World War I, something several Western developed countries – including France and Canada – have already done. …-
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1823893/posts
You know, tactics meant to keep the population unarmed and therefore vulnerable go way back.
In the Middle Ages, for example, restrictions were placed on the amount of fire-wood peasants could possess.
This wasn’t because of the dangers of deforestation, or anything. Forging metal armaments takes a great deal of heat and, thus, a great deal of fire-wood. By restricting access to fire-wood, then, the forging of swords and other weapons remained the monopoly the elites.
LENIN,HITLER,STALIN,MAO SI TUNG,BILL CLINTON,UN,CFR they all dusarmed the people then they sround them up into concentraion camps