Why this blog?
Until this moment I have been forced to listen while media and politicians alike have told me "what Canadians think". In all that time they never once asked.
This is just the voice of an ordinary Canadian yelling back at the radio -
"You don't speak for me."
email Kate
Goes to a private
mailserver in Europe.
I can't answer or use every tip, but all are appreciated!
Katewerk Art
Support SDA
Paypal:
Etransfers:
katewerk(at)sasktel.net
Not a registered charity.
I cannot issue tax receipts
Favourites/Resources
Instapundit
The Federalist
Powerline Blog
Babylon Bee
American Thinker
Legal Insurrection
Mark Steyn
American Greatness
Google Newspaper Archive
Pipeline Online
David Thompson
Podcasts
Steve Bannon's War Room
Scott Adams
Dark Horse
Michael Malice
Timcast
@Social
@Andy Ngo
@Cernovich
@Jack Posobeic
@IanMilesCheong
@AlinaChan
@YuriDeigin
@GlenGreenwald
@MattTaibbi
Support Our Advertisers
Sweetwater
Polar Bear Evolution
Email the Author
Pilgrim's Progress
How Not To Become A Millenial
Trump The Establishment
Wind Rain Temp
Seismic Map
What They Say About SDA
"Smalldeadanimals doesn't speak for the people of Saskatchewan" - Former Sask Premier Lorne Calvert
"I got so much traffic after your post my web host asked me to buy a larger traffic allowance." - Dr.Ross McKitrick
Holy hell, woman. When you send someone traffic, you send someone TRAFFIC.My hosting provider thought I was being DDoSed. - Sean McCormick
"The New York Times link to me yesterday [...] generated one-fifth of the traffic I normally get from a link from Small Dead Animals." - Kathy Shaidle
"You may be a nasty right winger, but you're not nasty all the time!" - Warren Kinsella
"Go back to collecting your welfare livelihood. - "Michael E. Zilkowsky
$ FKA gord – I want to grab that little girl and run, drive off; get her away from those people. (Kids turn out to be what their parents think they should be 9 times out of 10.)
atlas is shrugging – no, Ellie’s right. Men have more “control” over c0ndom (filter voodoo) use than women do in practice. Not that those items are especially reliable, but still… yes, if the woman lied about being on birth control I can see how a man could justifiably legally get out of his parental responsibilities that way (in theory; in practice it would be he said/she said, but that’s true of most rape cases as well). Anyway, sleep with a liar and take your risks. She can decide whether to abort and a man has no input, nor should he have (whatever your position on the abortion question). This is one of those “life ain’t fair” things you can’t fix.
And let’s face it, noone who knocked up the woman in that video is paying her a dime, or even a round pound. That’s just not going to happen. Theodore Dalrymple will explain how this works.
She can decide whether to abort and a man has no input, nor should he have (whatever your position on the abortion question).
Not quite true, gov’t giveth, and gov’t taketh away abortion funding. And men mostly decide that…
“…Sandra gets an incapacity benefit for problms with her legs…”
Yeah. They’re too far apart.
Blogwrath said:
“Although I basically agree with your point about welfare and government jobs as symbols of dependence, I don’t think that making people their own bosses would have an absolutely positive effect, because it is impossible.
There are very few people who would take the enormous risk of starting their own business – the majority of our population is simply not up to living under a constant threat all the time. They’d rather work for someone who would take the risk and pay his workers the weekly wages.”
Specifically, this is not an issue. There only needs to be some entrepreneurs – not many – to start businesses. Furthermore, you do know there’s nothing wrong with being an employee of a private business . . . you know . . . a fair day’s work for a fair day’s pay and all that? And there’s really no need at all to draw a paycheck from /the State/, now, is there?
Generally, these words smack of ‘learned helplessness’. Blogwrath seems to imply that the only options are the cozy sheltering arms of Nanny Government or the cold bleak world of actually having to produce goods or services that people whould actually /choose/ to purchase with their own money. And that only “very few people” would be crazy enough to take that “enormous risk”.
I can’t argue with such a worldview, but I do think that Blogwrath’s words sound like the bleatings of a helpless sheep.