Dr. Richard Lindzen writes to me with news of this significant new paper saying “It has taken almost 2 years to get this out. “. Part of that problem appears to be hostile reviewers in earlier submissions to JGR, something we’ve seen recently with other skeptical papers, such as O’Donnell’s rebuttal to Steig et al (Antarctica is warming) where Steig himself inappropriately served as a reviewer, and a hostile one at that.
Hostile reviewers aside, the paper will now be published in an upcoming issue of the Asia-Pacific Journal of Atmospheric Sciences and I am honored to be able to be able to present it here.
Link fixed, thanks all.
Oops. Linky no worky.
Link has a rogue
in it. O_o.
Lol, my <br /> worked in ‘Preview’ but converted itself back to html when I posted.
Link still broken.
On the Observational Determination of Climate Sensitivity and Its Implications [PDF]
dizzy, thanks for the pdf. Glancing through it I came to a secondary conclusion that polar warming (or cooling) of several degrees could take place independent of global warming.
WalterF
35-40 years ago there was concern that soot and other blanketting particles could cause ice and snow melt in the N pole, a recent study stated that much of the melting in the N pole was due to soot. I think the Sooker and Hansonny Boy should be sent a memo.
Here’s a shorten and working link to the Anthony Watts post mentioned above: http://cli.gs/xdq2qtc
.
@martywd – Surely you meant to say: http://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/08/16/new-paper-from-lindzen-and-choi-implies-that-the-models-are-exaggerating-climate-sensitivity/
TRY This link to WUWT.
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/08/16/new-paper-from-lindzen-and-choi-implies-that-the-models-are-exaggerating-climate-sensitivity/