Climategate 2.0: The World Bank?

A little imagination goes a long way;

At http://foia2011.org I searched for worldbank.org and found 32 e-mails going back as far as 1998. I have only looked at three so far. Looks like the good old World Bank may be something of a puppet master.
[…]
Long but worth reading. Seems Robert Watson of the World Bank was TELLING good old Rajendra Pachauri and the crowd what to put into the Summary for Policymakers…

Update. Look you silly climate conspiracy nuts – Why on earth would the World Bank want to mess about with climate science?

15 Replies to “Climategate 2.0: The World Bank?”

  1. Follow the money and it can lead to amazing places. Just sad that the end result is millions of brainwashed greenies trying to save a planet that didn’t need saving and schools continuing perpetuate a calamity that doesn’t exist on young impressionable minds. Just the name “World Bank” should scare the hell out of anyone with a ounce of sense.

  2. Wow, there are some real nuggets in these emails, like this one under 3088
    “I raised this issue at the scoping meeting in Bad (very bad)
    Munstereieffel, where it was greeted with general agreement but it
    appeared to come as a complete surprise to many that scenarios should have
    a relationship to reality”
    Who would have thunk?

  3. [quote]I agree w/ Susan [Solomon] that we should try to put more in the bullet about “Subsequent evidence” […] Need to convince readers that there really has been an increase in knowledge – more evidence. What is it? [/quote]Overpeck:
    Susan with the Ozone hole & French Order (of some duty done) with ribbons & metals.. Who would guess that she has not been charged with Perjury (the Virginia deposition). It will not go away, and the District Attorney will be vilified if he fails to charge Susan…think Penn State

  4. I think a lot of folks will be surprised when the republicans sign a US carbon tax — or some variant — into law. Look for that to happen fairly soon after they take over in January 2013. If history is any guide, there will be very little done differently once the Obamanaut is thrown out of office.

  5. Talk about your “One World Orders.”
    Everybody pays-
    Even those poor bastards only making 2 dollars a day.
    Monies accumulate in the One World Bank (37 trillion) and our wonderful friends at the United Nations Peace Corps
    control those countries that try to get out of the Carbon Tax Comfort Zone.
    And we thought Al Global was stupid?

  6. This is not at all surprising. You should see how big the delegations from sub Saharan African countries are to these conferences. And you should read the local newspapers that report on global warming as opposed to local corruption and substandard government operations.
    The leaders of the developing world see a new source of easy money for their personal bank accounts. They and the world bank see an easy source of continuing funding from the developed world. Unlike donor money, this wouldn’t be open to being cut off by accountable politicians in the contributing countries.
    This along with the governance framework Lord Monkton exposed show the true purpose and colors of the UN.

  7. Gee, first they named a socialist party leader to head the IMF and now World bank is loaded with One-world-government schemers.
    What could possibly go wrong?

  8. Ken,
    You mentioned “666”. I teach Jr. High Science. Every year this time of year in the grade 9 curriculum I come around to atomic theory and atomic structure and I am reminded that the most common carbon isotope has 6 protons, 6 neutrons, and 6 electrons (666). Revelation 13:17 says .. “so that they could not buy or sell unless they had the mark, which is the name of the beast or the number of its name.” Maybe a “they” have plans for a world wide carbon tax on every transaction everywhere to fund the New World Order. This is something that I have been telling people, tongue in cheek for a few years, but it is starting to sound somewhat plausible.

  9. It would be impossible to have a one world government without the ability to levy a global tax.
    The way to convince a majority to go along with a tax is to also convince them that a crisis of global proportions is about to befall us.
    But a crisis that can be avoided but we must act now (before anyone can wise up to the ruse), monetize the air we breath and then impose a “credit system” that allows those that want the right to breathe the ability to pay for it.
    Have I got it about right?

Navigation