Climategate 2.0: The Searchable Andrew Revkin

What do you get when you cross the New York Times with a low-rent lefty blog?
You can’t – that’s incest.
Bumped for update on the “Revkin” email search: Rick Morano has been finding and finding and finding…

Revkin is contemplating running with a screwy idea, but Ray Pierrehumbert pulls him back into reality: ‘I think the notion of telling the public to prepare for both global warming and an ice age at the same creates a real public relations problem for us’

11 Replies to “Climategate 2.0: The Searchable Andrew Revkin”

  1. From Revkin’s column, regarding AGW and non-renewable resources:
    “You’re at the wheel of a bus full of kids that you’ve never driven before, rounding a curve on a mountainside road you’ve never driven. It’s getting foggy and rainy.
    Do you keep your pedal to the metal or do you ease off?’
    Those of us without fossil fuel phobia realize that there is no bus full of kids in imminent danger. That scary image is a figment of the True Believers imagination.
    In reality, those kids are on the same, well-traveled route their mom and dad took to school. In fact, the air is clearer and the water cleaner than back in their parents’ day. The only thing cluttering up the view is a bunch of fugly windtowers. Most of them aren’t even working – oh, no – one of those towering monsters just sliced an diced a beautiful bald eagle…tragic.

  2. The answer according to the warmists is that you stop the bus, unload the kids and then push the evil polluting bus off the cliff.

  3. On second thought, since the kids will grow up to be evil polluters, send them off the cliff in the bus.

  4. Revkin set up his metaphor to have the bus be humanity hurtling into the unknown with a likely disastrous result. The very first commenter turned it around to correctly portray the hurtling bus as the Climate Industry driving us off the curve into the abyss.
    L.C. Bennett above has it right. Air and water, at least in North America, is cleaner now than it was 50 or 100 years ago. Not sure about the Niger Delta or the Dohai Sea.

  5. did you ever wonder how the Warmongers came up with that 2 degree temperature rise being the tipping point, the goal?
    From the “Just Make Sh@t up Department”
    http://tinyurl.com/7fvyljz
    If it wasn’t so corrupt, it would be funny.
    Nice career you had Phil, too bad you bent over and screwed yourself.

  6. How can Andrew Rvkin talk about driving a bus when I doubt he could past the test,for school bus driver….bicyle also..bags of wind just create more air currents….with little or no substance

  7. Releasing CO2 is the least of the problems that humans are causing. CO2 does not compromise ‘a properly clean environment to live in’. There’s been a lot more CO2 in the atmosphere in the past and in those times plants and the animals that lived on the plants thrived. Every year in the summertime the river valleys around here get over 400ppm CO2, and nobody gets sick or dies, the vegetation is lush and the herbivores love it.
    The dirty environment is caused by TOXIC pollution, habitat destruction, groundwater depletion, species elimination, overpopulation… All of these are far greater problems, and they’re all 100% caused by humans. No debate required.
    So instead of trying to make everyone else conform to their beliefs, people should focus on mitigating the serious problems humans are causing, starting with their own lives and the neighborhood and local community around them. Positive change does not come from government regulations, accords, or laws; it comes from the ground up starting with us.

  8. North of 60
    Yeah I agree with you about what constitutes REAL POLUTION.
    However, the warmists cling to this CO2 AGW scam tenachiously because it is their last great white hope to institute unelected, socialist WORLD GOVERNMENT with of course them incharge.
    It is not an agenda driven to benefit humanity but to benefit them individualy…notice the lifestyles of GORE, SUZUKI, the heads of the IPCC, UN, UNESCO etc….remember that “OIL FOR FOOD” UN scandal?

Navigation