Why this blog?
Until this moment I have been forced to listen while media and politicians alike have told me "what Canadians think". In all that time they never once asked.
This is just the voice of an ordinary Canadian yelling back at the radio -
"You don't speak for me."
email Kate
Goes to a private
mailserver in Europe.
I can't answer or use every tip, but all are appreciated!
Katewerk Art
Support SDA
Paypal:
Etransfers:
katewerk(at)sasktel.net
Not a registered charity.
I cannot issue tax receipts
Favourites/Resources
Instapundit
The Federalist
Powerline Blog
Babylon Bee
American Thinker
Legal Insurrection
Mark Steyn
American Greatness
Google Newspaper Archive
Pipeline Online
David Thompson
Podcasts
Steve Bannon's War Room
Scott Adams
Dark Horse
Michael Malice
Timcast
@Social
@Andy Ngo
@Cernovich
@Jack Posobeic
@IanMilesCheong
@AlinaChan
@YuriDeigin
@GlenGreenwald
@MattTaibbi
Support Our Advertisers
Sweetwater
Polar Bear Evolution
Email the Author
Pilgrim's Progress
How Not To Become A Millenial
Trump The Establishment
Wind Rain Temp
Seismic Map
What They Say About SDA
"Smalldeadanimals doesn't speak for the people of Saskatchewan" - Former Sask Premier Lorne Calvert
"I got so much traffic after your post my web host asked me to buy a larger traffic allowance." - Dr.Ross McKitrick
Holy hell, woman. When you send someone traffic, you send someone TRAFFIC.My hosting provider thought I was being DDoSed. - Sean McCormick
"The New York Times link to me yesterday [...] generated one-fifth of the traffic I normally get from a link from Small Dead Animals." - Kathy Shaidle
"You may be a nasty right winger, but you're not nasty all the time!" - Warren Kinsella
"Go back to collecting your welfare livelihood. - "Michael E. Zilkowsky
I’m always torn about things like this. On the one hand, there are far more important things for the state legislature to address, like the fact that the state is on a path to conservatorship (bankruptcy for a government entity) in the near future. On the other hand, I really don’t want the people in the state legislature addressing anything important, because they’ll make tbings worse.
Sidewalks are gender neutral. California’s recent ‘homeless’ law means a person can evacuate themselves anywhere, like herd animals, so the progressives are already ahead of this issue.
Well I’m certainly not torn on this non-issue. The state has no business in your bedroom and it sure as hell has no business in your bathroom – or in the public bathrooms on private property. Obviously progressives are so completely adrift from reality that they haven;t the basic knowledge of what a washroom is or its primary purpose – it is for the elimination of bodily waste with as much personal privacy as can be afforded to maintain personal dignity – the washroom is not a place for social experiments and our personal privacy is not part of the civil compact with government. And yes, washrooms ARE a matter of “plumbing”. If they want to experience the burden of their stupid relativist gender policies they should start by inviting confused gender politics into the washrooms in legislative buildings.
When some individuals are genuinely suffering in some way from having to share facilities either with other people whose physiology is the same as theirs or with those whose is different, the only proper solution is to make single bathrooms available to them one at a time – no sharing, no problem. But even if there were the resources to implement this, the agitators who are pushing this legislation wouldn’t be satisfied because they aren’t really trying to help any individuals. Their real objective of self-styled “progressives” is to undo all real progress that has been made before so that their failure to contribute anything worthwhile is less apparent. Marx is their hero because he sat around making up bullsh*t theories about how “the system” was all wrong, living in the house and off the generosity of his friend, (who felt guilty because he inherited his money,) while literally screwing the lowly workers who served him.
once they put the urinals in the women s bathroom this will become mandatory or womandatory
http://www.go-girl.com/what-is-gogirl.asp
In terms of waste elimination the University of Regina conflates “gender-confused” with “physically-challenged”
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/saskatchewan/story/2013/02/18/sk-gender-neutral-washrooms-ur.html
Two words: home schooling. School board budgets are made based on attendance. It is possible to make them behave if you get enough people together.
Anyone with ‘boy bits’ found using the same washroom that my daughter is, will encounter the business end of a baseball bat in short order.
What part of “your plumbing decides” is so effing hard for these freaks to understand about using the bathroom? Oh! Right-it’s not hard to understand. Therefore it is yet another attempt to confuse and groom children for abuse.
Yeah well, generally I’m traditional and slightly to the right of Attilla on most things.
Having to share a public washroom with an aggressive “funny boy” ain’t fun neither.
I got 2 washrooms in my abode, neither disignated as per gender, and I get no complaints from familly/guests.
That sitcoom, Alley McBeal, featured a unisex bathroom, which made some sense…..like most guys Luci Lui was my prime interest.
I don’t see what the problem with gender identity is. They have DNA tests for that.
For the minuscule percentage of the population that has an ambiguous gender identity, I’m sure they will figure it out the way they have for thousands of years.
Just another way to marginalise the Female sex. I the name of toleration, even the right of privacy is stolen from Women. Not t mention putting them in danger of rape, or murder.
To use a well-worn, but appropriate phrase: “What could possibly go wrong?”
Ok.
I’m a (perpetually) pre-operative transsexual lesbian. Does that mean I get to go in the girl’s bathroom now? Goody…