The O’s budget doesn’t even get 12 revisions.
ABC News has obtained 12 different versions of the talking points that show they were extensively edited as they evolved from the drafts first written entirely by the CIA to the final version distributed to Congress and to U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Susan Rice before she appeared on five talk shows the Sunday after that attack.
Can you say “COVER-UP”
I sure in the heck can.
I remember in the second debate that I was shocked Romney did not go after Obama on Bengazi to any significant degree. I guess I now know why.
The 12 Lies of the “Obama-Nation(tm)”.
Obviously they needed 12 revisions, because they didn’t know which lie would best cover up the malfeasance, stupidity and most of all arrogance demonstrated by this regime.
This was an asinine concocted ploy at the re-election of “Obama-Nation(tm)”; which defied the narrative that terrorism had been defeated. Of course the Boston Bombing has now safely laid that ridiculous theory to rest.
I fully expect the squirming to continue as the directive chain leads invariably up the chain of command straight back to Hillary and the “Obama-Nation(tm)”.
The drip, drip, drip of eroding power as it silently slips like sand through their soiled fingers.
Psalm 47:3 He subdued peoples under us, and nations under our feet.
Cheers
Hans Rupprecht, Commander in Chief
1st Saint Nicolaas Army
Army Group “True North”
What can you expect from an administration run by a Muslim?
Well,Saudi,Lybia,Egypt,Iran,etc. are sorta of hell holes.Oh wait.You are talking about the USSA.My mistake.:):)
The twelve revisions are icing on the cake. When it became so blindingly obvious that no Youtube video response was to blame (the nature of the attack, closed circuit cameras, delayed military/FBI response, the arrest of the offending director, the repeated requests for security and Obama’s absence), everyone knew (but perhaps did not care) what happened and who was to blame.
Americans need to ask themselves how badly they still want this murderer in office.
Can you get the U.S. media to say “COVER-UP”?
Who’s in bed with who here?
I don’t believe that the buck stops with Secretary Rice, or with Secretary Clinton. Sure they were involved with continuing this great lie(s) however, all these roads lead to B. Hussien. He chose to try and disengage from this matter of national security, after watching it unfold in “real time” from within the White House.
The military that was in charge on 9.10.2012, the day prior to this event, haven’t told their story. The military leaders now in charge in Germany and Italy on the US military bases haven’t been heard from. Why does it take a new administration (in 3 1/2 years) to hear from them?
All these people, the Secretaries involved, the military brass both relieved of duty and currently serving, and sitting President should be brought before Congress and asked what happened by anyone not willing to take a “what does it even matter” or the long 12 minutes of rambling response that B. Hussien typically gives to yes/no questions. Let them continue questioning straight through until august if that’s what it takes. Let the debt ceiling be reached, O’idiot has had years to put together a budget and has failed in this regard comprehensively.
Then the msm can explain to the people why this story is a big deal, and why they failed to cover it as it was unfolding.
“Then the msm can explain to the people why this story is a big deal, and why they failed to cover it as it was unfolding.”
Bwahahahaha….choke….cough….gurgle.Damn marc.Thanks for the best line since Turdeau Jr pretends to be a math guy.And how is the Suckster’s cAGW working out for you down south of us Edmonchuks?
Honestly…you folks are way, wayyyy,too picky.
Everything is in the capable hands of the Press and Himself.
“Nothing to see here, now move along shall we.” (sarc)
“Transparency: WH Holds Benghazi Briefing … Off-the-Record”
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Peace/2013/05/10/White-House-Benghazi-off-the-record
AGW Alleged Global Warming? 😉
Seriously, I don’t see how the msm can explain all this without pointing a finger at those that briefed the media.
and B. Hussien / O’idiot is at the root of this. He’s the root cause.
Well at least the MSM is waking up to it. But they are still concentrating on the cover-up lie, when they sghould be asking why nothing was done DURING the attack, which they KNEW was going on.
It’ll be all hands on deck to protect the Commander-in-Chief, I mean Commander-in-AWOL
Just watching Carney stumble thru the WH presser,painful to watch,and blame Rep.all round.
And now, Team Obama has cancelled the scheduled news briefing to conduct a secret news briefing with select Media members.
WTH ?
Boehner and McDonnell better grow a pair and DEMAND to know who called this meeting and who attended.
As far as I know, that guy who made the film this thing got falsely blamed on is still in jail.
There’s a law against that, isn’t there?
“….due to the privacy provisions of the Child, Youth and Family Enhancement Act.”
Enhancement. Inspector Ricky got a brother writing script in Alberta?
Here’s a page from the Canadian Oxford Dictionary for The Perpetually Drivelling:
A is for Affordable
B is for ‘bama
C is for Celebrate
D is for Diversity
E is for Enhance
F is for …….
Here’s 7 minutes of Jay Carney tap dancing with a monkey:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=21algdhMEjw&list=FLkNf8o-ad2osEl7JtS1_7XA&index=1
Damn. Wrong place. Scusez moi!
That’s why the president of the USA has the title Commander in Chief.
The person who holds the presidency gives the ultimate approval as to when to go for it or when to stand down.
Plenty of circled wagons to get through yet and plenty of outside defenders of the White House to work through before this is settled.
At least ABC and CBS are starting to show some interest. I’m guessing MSNBC will continue to defend the perpetrators.
This is strangely encouraging news.
As in full panic mode, call in your trusties and get the “message” sorted out.
The media who attended are complicit and exposed.
Ha ha. A very revealing mistake.
My take is that the Administration saw that Ambassador Stevens was compromised. He was the one brokering the arms to the rebels in Syria and the Middle East, and if the American people were to get wind of it before the election, there wouldn’t be a snowballs chance in hell that they would be getting re-elected. So they find some wing-nut’s film about Mohammad, and know that its contents are very inflammatory, and put it out there on the internet and fan the flames of religious intolerance.
Meanwhile, they dump some info into the Benghazi community about Stevens (maybe even his sexual proclivities which are seen as vile to the locals – why else would they attack him, beat him to near death and drag him through the streets like an animal?), the secret safe-house location and maybe some info on when and where and how, and the bad guys take it hook, line and sinker.
What really needs to be determined is what was the detonation trigger for the attack. Who and what motivated these guys to “suddenly” and “spontaneously” bring a bunch of guns and mortars (which were very exact in their target positions) to an “anti-video party”? Not likely!!!
Right now, the Administration and House are fighting over the details of communication, and not how privy information of where the safe-house and the movements of the Ambassador were “not so hidden”. The pulling back of the special ops is a no-brainer that somebody high up knew what was really going on and needed the scenario to play out according to their rules and gameplan.
What we are seeing is gamesmanship. This thing needs to get serious and call the players into Congress and throw the book at them. If somebody knew something and didn’t say or played “the Game”, they should be pounding rocks into sand with a tack-hammer for a couple of decades.
Frustrating when schmucks like me can see this but they can’t…or can I?
Holy Carp! I couldn’t listen to all that carp. Note he absolutely denies the White House was involved. It was all though other involved groups, not responsible to the WH that decided what the facts were amopngst themselves; the WH was not involved.
Yes, we know the WH, more specifically the President, was not involved becausse he’s only, like, the Commander in Chiefof the US Armed Forces and State Department.
And we know he wasn’t involved because no-one saw him when after he was informed of thee attack. He ran and hid.
Glacierman: “What really needs to be determined is what was the detonation trigger for the attack. Who and what motivated these guys to “suddenly” and “spontaneously” bring a bunch of guns and mortars (which were very exact in their target positions) to an “anti-video party”? Not likely!!!
Two events can help explain this “spontaneity.” First within two weeks of the attack, the brother of AQ #1 was released from from an Egyptian prison and headed directly to Libya. Secondly, a high ranking AQ affiliate leader was killed by a drone attack shortly before the consulate attack.
BTW, there is no way the CIA vetted the comments; they were fully aware from day one this was a coordinated AQ attack and never, never had anything to do with a obscure, non-event video.
Jay Carney said there was only one stylistic change.
The one change was a style of honesty to a style of falsehood and lies.
Stephen Hayes at The Weekly Standard has said that the CIA brief forwarded to the administration had no mention of any movie being the cause of this. (on the Mark Levin Show a few moments ago.)
Jay Carney will live all his days with this stink following him.
http://www.weeklystandard.com/articles/benghazi-scandal-grows_722032.html
and I don’t know why this link has 20.May.2013 for todays date, I assume it’s a typo.
That’s what happens when you put your talking points on a Scrabble board. Saddest thing is watching the White House still saying they didn’t eat the cupcake with icing on their nose.
Fess up, damn it.
I’m sure what Jay Carney meant to do was go through the twelve revised points one by one. I’m sure that’s it.
Glacierman: (maybe even his sexual proclivities which are seen as vile to the locals – why else would they attack him, beat him to near death and drag him through the streets like an animal?)
and, don’t forget sodomized him (and, with what?)
That because of a never-seen video? Even Hillary could come up with something better than that.
His family has had to live with this, and they’re keeping very quiet unlike a couple of other parents.