Why this blog?
Until this moment I have been forced to listen while media and politicians alike have told me "what Canadians think". In all that time they never once asked.
This is just the voice of an ordinary Canadian yelling back at the radio -
"You don't speak for me."
email Kate
Goes to a private
mailserver in Europe.
I can't answer or use every tip, but all are appreciated!
Katewerk Art
Support SDA
Paypal:
Etransfers:
katewerk(at)sasktel.net
Not a registered charity.
I cannot issue tax receipts
Favourites/Resources
Instapundit
The Federalist
Powerline Blog
Babylon Bee
American Thinker
Legal Insurrection
Mark Steyn
American Greatness
Google Newspaper Archive
Pipeline Online
David Thompson
Podcasts
Steve Bannon's War Room
Scott Adams
Dark Horse
Michael Malice
Timcast
@Social
@Andy Ngo
@Cernovich
@Jack Posobeic
@IanMilesCheong
@AlinaChan
@YuriDeigin
@GlenGreenwald
@MattTaibbi
Support Our Advertisers
Sweetwater
Polar Bear Evolution
Email the Author
Pilgrim's Progress
How Not To Become A Millenial
Trump The Establishment
Wind Rain Temp
Seismic Map
What They Say About SDA
"Smalldeadanimals doesn't speak for the people of Saskatchewan" - Former Sask Premier Lorne Calvert
"I got so much traffic after your post my web host asked me to buy a larger traffic allowance." - Dr.Ross McKitrick
Holy hell, woman. When you send someone traffic, you send someone TRAFFIC.My hosting provider thought I was being DDoSed. - Sean McCormick
"The New York Times link to me yesterday [...] generated one-fifth of the traffic I normally get from a link from Small Dead Animals." - Kathy Shaidle
"You may be a nasty right winger, but you're not nasty all the time!" - Warren Kinsella
"Go back to collecting your welfare livelihood. - "Michael E. Zilkowsky
They lasted 1000 years. We’ll be lucky to last 100!!
Interesting to see history from a Russian prospective.
Interesting to see history from a Russian prospective.
Ideological hooey.
A tsunami of self-serving bullshit has overwhelmed every effort to contain it, and we’re left, once again, with the ancient question: who has the most effective weapons? Us or them?.
Your history lesson of the day. Brought to you by the Russian Orthodox Church. Fair and balanced as they say (sarc).
WOW! That is some awesome propaganda. Take a little truth here, twist it a little to suit your purpose there, build on it, repeat, and WALLA!
Yeah, that was… weird. I had to shut it off when it said Capitalism is the genetic continuation of militaristic plundering.
Well, what can you expect from a monk? The anti-capitalist slant goes much too far, though.
What you are seeing in this video is a common, and old (much older than communism), Russian and Orthodox critique of the West. It is largely true – and we certainly helped to end Byzantium, and let the muslim hordes gain easy access to the West.
The perils of untrammelled muslim access are graphically shown. Constantinople is no longer Greek, nor Roman; and we are very much the losers. Our shame.
It took the muslims 700 years to conquer the Red Apple, as they called Constantinople. It won’t take them nearly so long to take the Big Apple, NYC.
John, well said. We are as ripe for the Muslim takeover as the Romans were for the “barbarian” takeover of the period 200 AD – 400 AD.
“WALLA!”???? “WALLA!”????? Is that some type of a muslim incantation? Or is that the word “WALLOW” being spoken with one of those sloppy, lazy accents from the southern part of the Excited States of ‘Murrca? You probably think the USA won WWII all by itself too.
Amongst the nostalgia and farewell to Cassius Clay, aka Muhammad Ali – a lesson for Hillary at no charge:
“I was on vacation in Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, and saw an ad in the local paper. Ali, by then almost a decade into his battle with Parkinson’s disease, was still making about 100 public appearances a year, every one of them for charity, this particular event for the Special Olympics.”
http://news.nationalpost.com/full-comment/christie-blatchford-muhammad-ali-faced-the-world-with-selflessness-and-bravery
Just a thought of a bit fantasy, Russia taking over Turkey to protect “the greatest religion” ?
Voila ? … as interpreted through a mid western, middle eastern, Somali, dialect ?
Par for the course for one of Obama’s “Dreamers”
@JohnPeg:
Holly Batman John, get a grip. You’re way over the top on this. Okay, it should have been “Voila”. So can you now turn it down a notch and stop focusing on the small stuff. Did you or did you not buy into the video?
And as a note, I speak English and Spanish. I had two years of Latin in High School as well. I never bothered with French because it makes no phonetic sense …. what is written barely relates to what is spoken. Voila!
I recently read a prety exhaustive history of Byzantium (John Julian Norwich, 3 volumes!). Long read but worth it. What this video is saying looks pretty much true, and Western Crisendom did indeed betray the original Christian Empire, which Byzantium was. And when Byzantium finally fell to the Turk (=Islam), the last Emporor died fighting, leapt into the fray and his body never found. Do we think Emperor Hillary would do the same?
I recently read a prety exhaustive history of Byzantium (John Julian Norwich, 3 volumes!). Long read but worth it. What this video is saying looks pretty much true, and Western Crisendom did indeed betray the original Christian Empire, which Byzantium was. And when Byzantium finally fell to the Turk (=Islam), the last Emporor died fighting, leapt into the fray and his body never found. Do we think Emperor Hillary would do the same?
Gareth, thanks for your comment. I have many books on Roman history and the Roman army, but none about the Byzantine Empire. Thanks to Lance for posting this video and to you for your tip of John Julian Norwich’s history.
I knew something of the history of Byzantium, mainly military history, but as stated above, it is always interesting to get that history from another perspective. The Byzantines being Orthodox, and the current Russian church being Orthodox, a natural antipathy for Roman Catholicism is understandable. It was interesting to see how Bolshevism’s residue continues to inform the historical slant of the film, which was, not very subtly, an allegorical apologia for the current form of Russian nationalism under Putin.