41 Replies to “Bake that Cake”

    1. man memories are short. scotus found in favor of the baker in the last last bigoted decision from Colorado. what was that, about two weeks ago?

  2. Hey they were just trying to avoid gay cake splatter.

    Prosit!

    Hans Rupprecht, Commander in Chief
    1st Saint Nicolaas Army
    Army Group ‘True North’

  3. From the comments on the linked story…
    “The Left is rife with emotional adolescents who lack any sense of proportion and perspective.”

  4. It’s too bad that Sanders couldn’t file a discrimination suit with the same Colorado judge. It would be nice to see a lefties head spin trying to justify not selling a cake as discrimination while refusing service and telling someone to leave as not being discrimination.

  6. Refuse. to bake any cake at any time for anyone you please.

    Refuse to pay any fine or other penalty for your refusal.

    Scream tour story from the rooftops.

    Grab any media attention you can.

    1. They set this baker up…..who in their right mind would eat something knowing you had to force them make it
      It’s all just more lies…….

      Damned if I would force a mechanic to work on my car……..

      ..and if this was some muzzie…you better believe no one would be forcing them to do it

    1. So you approve of the restaurant’s actions? I suppose you admire its political convictions. What if a Christian restaurant refuses to serve a prominent Muslim cleric out of religious convictions? Does being a Muslim confer rights that working for the President of the United States does not, in the United States?

        1. We are. The business owner is choosing to put their politics ahead of their business interests. They are alienating half of the country by doing so. They have sowed the wind, and will reap the whirlwind.

          And I agree with you that the business owner is quite vile.

        2. it seems that we can easily judge you by your words. you lack intelligence and critical thinking skills.

    2. The press lies and lies and lie and they try to turn the press briefings into a circus and she handles them beautifully, never rising her voice or swearing or calling them names. Yet she is subjected to endless abuse and hatred by the left. It is sickening!

  8. They should just have told them that their “cake guy” would be on holidays for the period of said “wedding party” & nobody else was any good at “cakes”. If the “perps” argued about that, then throw them out. Legally. It would have cost them less than the legal fees to fight this in court. The “perps” would have found another bakery to do the deed. They don’t bake any cakes for a week or two of said wedding celebration & resume business as usual, thereafter.

    1. I suspect in Denver, the “perps” could find all the bakeries they want that would bake a wedding cake for a gay marriage. No, they probably had gone through half of the yellow pages before finding one who would not.

  9. I’d be more concerned about the owner/a$$hole who recognized me and didn’t throw me out.
    “More ‘secret sauce’ on your dinner, dear?”
    Yech…

    1. Yes, but my take on the posting is the juxtaposition of “you have to bake that cake!” with “no dirty Trump supporters allowed here because you’re all haters!”.

      The left needs to decide whether denial of service is allowed or not. If it is, then stop complaining when their sacred cows get gored. If it’s not allowed then they had not cause to refuse her service.

    2. No! SCOTUS ruled the baker didn’t get treated fairly in his hearing because of the hatred towards Christianity expressed by the government officials who prosecuted. SCOTUS therefore did not rule on the gays/baker issue at all. I do wish people would take the time to learn the facts in these cases.

    1. I wish we could go back to the days of polite disagreement. The actions of the restaurant owner was despicable and low and mean. I don’t think hacking the menu is the appropriate response though.

      1. Appropriate? Turn about is fair play. We live in times when any response is appropriate, including extreme violence.

  12. Thanks for the story. We briefly stopped in Lexington this spring – beautiful city and we have plans to spend a couple of days there this fall. We will look up the Red Hen and carefully avoid it. I may even comment on such to the staff.

    I’m somewhat surprised the lefties haven’t tried to change the name of the University (i.e. Lee’s name). Robert E. Lee is buried under the chapel and his horse Traveler just outside the door in the garden.

  13. I personally don’t see a big deal. The Red Hen owner just made the choice that I’ll never choose to eat at any of their establishments. Plenty more restaurants worthy of my business.

  14. sounds like a need for sensitivity training is in order for the employees to help them understand the feelings of normal people

    1. The “LGBT” perverts working at the Red Hen should be hauled off to a closed institution, and the keys thrown away. There is no place for perverts in society outside a prison or an insane asylum. None at all.

      Sensitivity training? Aversion therapy, you mean. Tie a live wire to their you-know-whats and give them a painful shock for at least sixty seconds if they get an erection at the sight of a man or a child. They will quickly learn not to entertain disgusting fantasies about men or children.

      1. I have to disagree with you there A Canadian. No need to bring LGBTQRSTUV into it, people are people, culture is culture. Their culture is what’s wrong with them. I don’t care who or what someone likes to sleep with as long as they leave me alone, and that includes not being in my face that I must “accept them”. The owner was a discriminatory jerk, that’s all I care about in this case.

  15. I’ve taken the position in the past that a proprietor MUST be able to able to say ‘No, thank-you’ to any potential client he or she doesn’t want to enter into a transaction with. Banks do it every day!
    I can’t now say, “Oh, wait; Sarah Huckabee Sanders is a whole different situation!” I’ve made my bed…
    But yeh, boycott the restaurant. It’s the Right thing to do.
    (It’s a franchise? Not fair to take it out on other uninvolved franchisees, in other locations.)

    1. I’m torn on how the boycott should work, DaninVan. On the one hand they are cheapening the brand for all franchisees. On the other hand they are individuals who Sarah went out of her way to identify which franchise it was (so that the rest of the brand shouldn’t be harmed).

      But on the gripping hand, any degree of connection is seen as reason enough for a scorched earth campaign for those on the far left. If we are going to treat them as they treat us and use their methods against them, then scorched earth dictates that the brand chose to allow her to become one of them, and therefore that counts against the entire group unless a total surrender-type apology is rendered from corporate management. Not a typical Liberal “I’m sorry you’re incapable of understanding my brilliance” type apology, a REAL apology that makes plain that they have learned something.

      2. Thanks for responding. Yeh, it’s not an easy choice.
        Having spent the majority of my working life being self-employed I’m extremely sensitive to ‘reputation’. You can spend decades building it and have it wrecked in a day. Didn’t happen to me but not for want of trying by my final client (the bailiff straightened out his concept of how the World really works. 😉 )

  16. I still say the preferred response is to bake the fcukin cake.
    and accidentally make a huge mess out of it. oopsie!! lets try agin !!
    and another mess pinned on the brand new apprentice. oopsie !!
    try again. oopsie!! someone lef the cake out in the rain!!! (apologies to Richard Harris!!)
    try again. oopsie!!! sumbuddy dun opened the oven door and it slammed shut!!!
    try again. oopsie !!!
    try again. oopsie !!!
    oopsie oopsie fcukin oopsie oopse. welcome to Oopsieland !!!

Proudly powered by WordPress & Skyrocket Themes

MENU

Navigation