“CNN commentator Marc Lamont Hill, in a Wednesday speech to the United Nations, called for violent resistance against Israel and advocated expanding Palestine “from the river to the sea,” a phrase used by those who believe that Israel should be eliminated.”
“I believe in a single secular democratic state for everyone. This is the only way that historic Palestine will be free.”
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha…
Love to hear his thoughts on Hamas i.e., long form: Harakat al-Muqawamah al-‘Islamiyyah (Islamic Resistance Movement)!
Test 1 2 3
Tried to send a tweet with
https://www.smalldeadanimals.com/index.php/2018/11/28/the-libranos/
In the tweet but it wouldn’t let me send it until I removed
https://www.smalldeadanimals.com/index.php/2018/11/28/the-libranos/
Just thought you should know your being banned from links to your site by twitter…
https://o.aolcdn.com/images/dims?thumbnail=1200%2C630&quality=80&image_uri=https%3A%2F%2Fs.aolcdn.com%2Fhss%2Fstorage%2Fmidas%2Ff5e969129725727fe23e6cf8a4193530%2F200006454%2Ftwitter-turkey.jpg&client=cbc79c14efcebee57402&signature=aa1227311f17d2530f548ac98681c6f5f0bd5eb3
Yes ‘free speech’ advocates at Twitter; only in your wildest dreams.
They ‘need’ you to believe their version of ‘reality’…because well you don’t have the ‘correct’ beliefs!
Cheers
Hans Rupprecht, Commander in Chief
1st Saint Nicolaas Army
Army Group ‘True North’
The Internet will not be free until the monopolies: Facebook, Amazon, Twitter are broken up. They are engines used to silence the voices of all who disagree with their leftist worldview. Who wants to be ruled by the troika of Zuckerberg, Bezos, and Dorsey?
A scumbag from the ghetto hates Jews, because of course he does.
“American apartheid” indeed. Apartheid would have involved deporting the whole damn lot of them to their Liberian homeland, reserving America for civilized people.
Black Americans are the richest and most spoiled Negroids on planet earth, thanks in large part to apostates who bribed them with white taxpayer money to thrust the apostates into elective office—and turned a blind eye to black terrorism against pious Jews.
Historic Palestine?
Yeah, I’m OK with historic Palestine.
Because never in the history of the Mideast was there a nation known as Palestine.
The people calling themselves Palestinians are the descendants of Arab invaders, so then “historic Palestine” would mean they all leave and go live in the land of their ancestors, Saudi Arabia.
“Palestine” was the name given to the Holy Land by the Romans after expelling the Jews, after savage tribes the Israelites had defeated in battle and exterminated or driven out centuries previously.
The Roman emperor Hadrian, a notorious sodomite who, on the death of his favourite sissy, had statues of his fairy queen erected in every city in the empire, was delivering what he thought was the final insult to a people who saw him for the abomination he was. His plan was to blot out the name of Israel and her God forever.
Of course, it failed.
Dirtman: Expanded version –
And, let’s not forget that the Paleo flag is a “lift” from the Jordanian one. Let us also not forget the words of Zuheir Mohsen, – top PLO member responsible for Damur massacre:
“The Palestinian people does not exist. The creation of a Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of Israel for our Arab unity. In reality today there is no difference between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. Only for political and tactical reasons do we speak today about the existence of a Palestinian people, since Arab national interests demand that we posit the existence of a distinct “Palestinian people” to oppose Zionism. For tactical reasons, Jordan, which is a sovereign state with defined borders, cannot raise claims to Haifa and Jaffa, while as a Palestinian, I can undoubtedly demand Haifa, Jaffa, Beer-Sheva and Jerusalem. However, the moment we reclaim our right to all of Palestine, we will not wait even a minute to unite Palestine and Jordan.”
This fact was admitted by Professor Philip Hitti, an Arab historian who declared, “There is no such thing as Palestine in history, absolutely not.” This fact is further confirmed by the Saudi Arabia Representative at the United Nations. “It is common knowledge that Palestine is nothing but Southern Syria.”
Or Fathi Hammad, who said live on TV:“…half of the Palestinians are Egyptians and the other half are Saudis”How about Hafez Assad, Father of the Syrian “incumbent, who said to the PLO: “You do not represent Palestine as much as we do. Never forget this one point: There is no such thing as a Palestinian people, there is no Palestinian entity, there is only Syria.”
Then there’s Zuhair Muhsin, Executive Council, military commander of the PLO and member of the PLO: “There are no differences between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. We are all part of one nation. It is only for political reasons that we carefully underline our Palestinian identity… yes, the existence of a separate Palestinian identity serves only tactical purposes. The founding of a Palestinian state is a new tool in the continuing battle against Israel.”
And finally, a few words from retired terrorist, Walid Shoebat: “Why is it that on June 4th 1967 I was a Jordanian and overnight I became a Palestinian?” We did not particularly mind Jordanian rule. The teaching of the destruction of Israel was a definite part of the curriculum, but we considered ourselves Jordanian until the Jews returned to Jerusalem. Then all of the sudden we were Palestinians – they removed the star from the Jordanian flag and all at once we had a Palestinian flag”. When I finally realized the lies and myths I was taught, it is my duty as a righteous person to speak out”.
I’m about as Kosher as a pork chop with a fried oyster side, but I think I get it.
Furthermore, the origin of the name “Palestine” is interesting.
The Romans called it “Palaestina” as a rather nasty joke.
After the siege of Masada, Emperor Hadrian decided to erase the name of Judeah forever, so being literate and having a suitably grim, Roman sense of humour, he ordered the area to be renamed after earlier inhabitants of the region; a large band of notorious pirates. These were the “Peleshet”, a name which variously and loosely translates to “invaders” or “raiders”. They had long since ceased operating in the region, but their memory lingered across the eastern Mediterranean.
“Palaestina” was “anglicized” as Palestine, and here we are.
Great comment. Thanks
“The people calling themselves Palestinians are the descendants of Arab invaders, so then ‘historic Palestine’ would mean they all leave and go live in the land of their ancestors, Saudi Arabia.”
Just as the people of “historic America” should all leave and go live in the land of their ancestors, Europe?
And the ‘Indians’ should go back to Asia where they came from?
Absolutely!
In fact, everybody should “go back to where they came from”!
Migrating all over the place seems to be the latest fad anyway.
and he is too stupid to realize how racist he is and sounds.
Forget Ocasio-Cortez vs Ben Shapiro. Let’s get a Shapiro vs Marc Lamont Hill debate.
For sure after this speech CNN, being the ethical and professionally correct organization that it is, will decline to employ Mr. Lamont Hill as a commentator in the future.
Heh. Good one.
There has never been a sovereign state named Palestine. That much is quite true. But that is not an argument against the establishment of one. Neither Canada nor the US were sovereign states until they were established as such.
There has been a historical region named Palestine and a recognized Mandatory Palestine under the British. During the Mandate, all inhabitants of Palestine were legally Palestinians by national status; generally the terms used were “Palestinian Jew/Jewish Palestinian” and “Palestinian Arab/Arab Palestinian”.
Jewish Palestinians became Israelis overnight with the proclamation of the State of Israel in 1948; Arab Palestinians remained Palestinians.
There is a basis for a sovereign state named Palestine. The argument is over what that state should look like. The Palestinians always depict it on flags and maps as the whole of the former Mandatory Palestine from the Jordan to the Mediterranean Sea, a hopeless proposition because Israel – a recognized sovereign state – isn’t going away.
In 1948, the Palestinian Jews accepted the UN partition plan and seized the moment to establish Israel in their allotted territory; the Palestinian Arabs rejected partition, then – even with the help of five neighbouring Arab states – singularly failed to push the Israelis into the sea. Indeed, the Israelis actually ended up with slightly more territory as a result.
The Palestinians have been living in a Lalaland of denial ever since then. There will be no Palestinian state if they cannot accommodate the reality of Israel’s existence.
Why is a CNN commentator addressing the UN?
Because the UN sees Mr. Hill’s views (hatred of Jews, a supporter of violent left-wing extremism) as being representative of American thinking. CNN News certainly thinks so.
And here I thought CNN was the problem. Big mistake on my part.
This is what I am saying in my post above. CNN does have a problem.
why dont all those wealthy Jews pay sumbuddy to arrange to dox the pryck?
or a denial of service on their fcukin web site? maybe just ‘edit’ it a bit?
oh, right, east coast Jews are liberals. must be to allow that shyt land in their lap.
am I being anti-Semitic or just selectively anti-Semitic?