We wish to express our deep concern over the protracted controversy and political fall-out surrounding the OPCW and its investigation of the alleged chemical weapon attacks in Douma, Syria, on 7 April 2018.
Since the publication by the OPCW of its final report in March 2019, a series of worrying developments has raised serious and substantial concerns with respect to the conduct of that investigation. These developments include instances in which OPCW inspectors involved with the investigation have identified major procedural and scientific irregularities, the leaking of a significant quantity of corroborating documents, and damning statements provided to UN Security Council meetings. It is now well established that some senior inspectors involved with the investigation, one of whom played a central role, reject how the investigation derived its conclusions, and OPCW management now stands accused of accepting unsubstantiated or possibly manipulated findings with the most serious geo-political and security implications. Calls by some members of the Executive Council of the OPCW to allow all inspectors to be heard were blocked. […]
To date, unfortunately, the OPCW senior management has failed to adequately respond to the allegations against it and, despite making statements to the contrary, we understand has never properly allowed the views or concerns of the members of the investigation team to be heard or even met with most of them. It has, instead, side-stepped the issue by launching an investigation into a leaked document related to the Douma case and by publicly condemning its most experienced inspectors for speaking out.
In a worrying recent development, a draft letter falsely alleged to have been sent by the Director General to one of the dissenting inspectors was leaked to an ‘open source’ investigation website in an apparent attempt to smear the former senior OPCW scientist. The ‘open source’ website then published the draft letter together with the identity of the inspector in question. Even more alarmingly, in a BBC4 radio series aired recently, an anonymous source, reportedly connected with the OPCW Douma investigation, gave an interview with the BBC in which he contributes to an attempt to discredit not only the two dissenting inspectors, but even Ambassador Bustani himself. Importantly, recent leaks in December 2020 have evidenced that a number of senior OPCW officials were supportive of one OPCW inspector who had spoken out with respect to malpractice.
Tucker Carlson: “If the Pentagon & our media can lie about pretext in order to justify bombing sovereign countries & get away with it, then they will do it again & that should concern you.”
“Russian asset” Tulsi, vindicated. There was plenty of skepticism here at the time.
When President Trump bombed the base in Syria, he more or less warned ahead that he was.
So, their were minimal casualties as the media was pushing to have something there bombed for all the poor dead and crippled children that the whitehats claimed were there being gased.
That’s why one of the deals with Russia was to get rid of the whitehats and Canada took a few of them.
Good for Ms.Gabbard being vindicated – she endured a full court press from her political opponents and media chuckleheads. I don’t like her politics but she didn’t deserve that level of bullshit.
If you’re in need of a good laugh watch Jimmy Dore dissect former NYTimes employee Bari Weiss after a truly awkward moment on Joe Rogan’s show where she describes Tulsi Gabbard as an “Assad toadie”.
Rogan: “What’s a toadie?”
Weiss: “Um, Jamie…can you check what toadie means?”
Yeah, that’s how bad they are.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jS-sxJFn6O0
Thanks… a great laugh for Saturday morning!
Motherload takes on a whole new meaning!
One of the reasons we didn’t bomb chemical weapons sites, is because when the bombs dropped on a chemical weapon , idiot spreads for miles and miles and it kills children women and young and old men and cats and elephants.
Joe Biden doesn’t know the difference and believes he is living in 1950.
Just pray that he doesn’t think Canada has any terrorist
Biden is getting the best advice money can buy…his secretary of defense Lloyd Austin sat on the board of directors for Raytheon Industries, finally putting to rest Trump’s specious claim of ex military types enriching themselves sitting on the boards of defense contractors.
And I’m sure glad Lloyd was grilled about this during his Senate confirmation hearing…oh wait, he wasn’t.
Silly Burton … “that guy up there, who I mistakenly call General” … is a BLACK man! Unassailable. Unquestionable. Just shut up and vote yes.
““We were always playing shell games to not make clear to our leadership how many troops we had there,” he told Defense One.
After the defeat of ISIS, the president gave orders to withdraw our troops — but the likes of Jeffrey simply defied them. Twice, in fact: in 2018 and 2019. “What Syria withdrawal?” There was never a Syria withdrawal,” Jeffrey told reporter Katie Bo Williams. “When the situation in northeast Syria had been fairly stable after we defeated ISIS, [Trump] was inclined to pull out. In each case, we then decided to come up with five better arguments for why we needed to stay. And we succeeded both times.”
https://nypost.com/2020/11/17/leaks-and-lies-as-the-military-tries-to-undermine-president-trump/
And the brainless media cheer when civilian overseeing of the military is defied.
All hail the Narrative.
Who cares how many poor brown people die?
As long as the “Proper Narrative” prevails.
2021 is the year.
The International Year of Lying.
Or The Year of the Lie…
There must be a catchy acronym lurking..
Hysteria and fear work..
Short term.
Eventually exhaustion sets in and the herd culls those doing the shrieking.
Does not matter if they are true or false.
Except truth is stronger than a lie,because it stands alone.
The litany of lies vital to every kleptocracy and power grab,eventually fractures..
Too many impossible things to believe.
As that age old question breaks through them all.
“Are you better off today?”..With the loving help of the Central Bureaus?
The SPEED with which this was called a “chemical attack” implied the falsehood. Added to that was the reuse of “file videos” depicting the victims of chemical attack. The same little boy we’ve seen multiple times in prior atrocities committed by the Jew and Christian West.
This event was clearly used by the US Military establishment to FORCE Trump’s hand. To FORCE an Oval Office meeting with Pentagon officials. To CONVINCE PDJT to restart all the prior attacks on Syria and Assad. To resume the arming and support of unknown and unnamed “resistance”.
No, this does not vindicate Gabby, this doesn’t vindicate anything. This is a list of pretty much nothing. The Courage Foundation?