44 Rats

9 Replies to “44 Rats”

1. So, how exactly did the CDC come to these conclusions?

   https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/recommendations/pregnancy.html

   They seem pretty confident in their advice. But, beware the “weasel words.” They are there…check it out.

   Then there is this:
   https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/recommendations/pregnancy.html#anchor_1628692520287

   If they didn’t include pregnant HUMANS in the clinical testing….how can they make these statements? Yikes.

   1. Wow…they based their opinions of safety NOT on the Covid “vaccine” but on the Ebola platform.

      [[[No adverse pregnancy-related outcomes occurred in previous clinical trials that used the same vaccine platform as the J&J/Janssen COVID-19 vaccine. ]]]

2. Is it my imagination or has the Internet Clean-up Squad been hard at work?
   https://search.brave.com/search?q=mRNA+Covid+vacines%2Bmiscarriages
   What happened to all those news reports of abnormally high numbers of miscarriages and stillbirths?
   Hopefully someone(s) saved them from the purge.

3. When Thalidomide was approved for human use, they hadn’t done any experiments on pregnant women.

   I was born in 1960, in the middle of the time period this drug was available in Canada.

   https://www.sciencemuseum.org.uk/objects-and-stories/medicine/thalidomide

4. Why the hell is everybody tripping over themselves to call Naomi Wolf doctor? She got a PhD in English lit — “death recorded” anyone? — and she is putting it to use precisely nowhere (which is all to the good, yes). She already had a big platform with just her name, now this insecure doctor doctor doctor business. She’s a doctor of my ass.

   1. She is an excellent researcher and a good communicator. She works with a lot of knowledgeable people. Since when are all people called ” doctors” medical practitioners? That’s just one area of expertise. If you have a PhD, you have achieved a high level of academic accomplishment that deserves acknowledgement.

      1. The tradition used to be that academics went by professor or just put the Phd after their name (still a bit crass though). That aside: it’s like Wolf has had the Dr sutured to the front of her name. It’s not a big deal, I know, and I don’t mean to make a fuss–I certainly like a lot of the work she’s been doing lately–but I can’t think of the last time I’ve heard an honorific used with such relentless, hammer-like frequency.

         And to Bush: same applies to Jill Biden, obviously. This is a non-partisan quibble. Doctorates in education, I would further argue, have an inverse relationship to academic merit.

         1. Anyway, this is a distraction. Apologies.

5. But you’re ok with Dr. Jill Biden?