53 Replies to “Margin Of Fraud”

  1. Is this like all of the “election fraud” in the 2020 election? “We don’t understand, therefore fraud”

      1. Your comment doesn’t stand…..it sits under a rock. The corruption in elections in absolutely enormous. And it doesn’t have to be rampant, in your face corruption…..there are a few seats that are very tight and it is in those seats where the corruption takes place. We already know that social media companies played a critical role in the last Presidential and recent mid terms as did the deep state (which absolutely exists). And we know China played a significant role in Canada’s elections….which is no surprise given that many Liberals are actually Maoists pretending to be Liberals.

      3. “My comment still stands.”

        As an absolute joke, yes. You certainly won’t ever find any fraud if you keep turning your head every time evidence of it is placed right in front of your face, just as the Democrat judges in the US have done so far.

    3. It’s more like “we don’t want to understand, therefore it can’t be fraud”.

      1. Or people are so damn lazy they won’t even read the court filings. I remember being absolutely lit up here when I said the court cases would fail.

        2000 mules is a joke, it doesn’t show a single crime being committed

        Maricopa audit is an even bigger joke.

        How many wackadoodle theories disappeared? Italian secret satellites. Ballots shipped from China. Embedded ballot watermarks. More votes than voters. Lindells promised PCAPs. Flipped votes.

        1. As opposed to those that stuck around, like 81 million votes, videos of cartons of ballots being wheeled in from hiding under tables after scrutineers were told to go home because of a supposed water main rupture which turned out to be nothing more than a leaky toilet, or how about that 3 am vote flip? Bad images printed on ballots that wouldn’t scan properly… Fraudulent and unverified signatures… dead people voting… obsolete voter roles… I suppose if I had more time, I can come up with a few more.

          1. First one is debunked. No foul play.

            “3 AM vote flips” is nonsense.

            Fraudulent signatures? Says who? Do you mean Dr. Shiva who didn’t even have access to the voter signatures?

            “Dead people voting” yes there were a few cases of this. Some were people that voted by mail then died before election day. Others were when a voter died and a spouse – get this REPUBLICAN – voted on their behalf.

          2. ^^^Says who? You???^^^

            Are you some kind of legal “expert?” Because we all know how bang-on experts have been over the last 3 years… and counting!

            How about some sources “debunking” the 3 am vote flip? They actually STOPPED COUNTING votes, coincidently in ALL FIVE of the battleground states AT THE SAME TIME, when TRUMP was LEADING in ALL FIVE of these states, then, miraculously, when they resumed counting in ALL FIVE of the battle ground states, BIDEN WAS LEADING in ALL FIVE OF THE BATTLEGROUND STATES!!! (do you see a pattern here?) Just what are the odds???
            So who is your source? MSNBC? CNN? Van Jones? Just who is feeding you this crap?

            “A FEW CASES???” I think you’re using just a little too much bleach in your whitewashing. The one case that you do cite happens to be a republican. Give me a break!
            Yeah… that’s why the Arizona SC sent back to trial court granting the order to verify the signatures! Just keep that head buried in the sand, Allan S.
            But you’re the legal expert, Allan S, so why don’t you explain the AZ SC’s action?

        2. I admire you for your consistency! As long as any act has not been proven to be literally criminal in a court of law – you are hunky dory with it.

          You well know how the legal system is stacker up against proving election law. In many situations you have to be able to demonstrate that there was sufficient amount of fraud to swing an election – while being denied access to inspect the the evidence!

          The more clever and devious sleaze the Democrats get away with, the higher their star rises in your eyes.

          1. Election lawsuits are filed in civil court, not criminal. Your claims have to be plausible to survive a motion to dismiss and proceed to the discovery phase. Please don’t bother with the “evidentiary hearing” nonsense. As soon as someone brings it up, I instantly know that they’re ignorant on how the legal system works.

        3. What motivates you to get so exercised over what, by now, should be obvious to a blind deaf mute. A puzzle for the ages. Are you a bought and paid for influencer. Something very telling about what provokes you.

          1. “What motivates you to get so exercised over what, by now, should be obvious to a blind deaf mute. A puzzle for the ages. Are you a bought and paid for influencer. Something very telling about what provokes you.”

            I’ve been thinking the same for quite some time. He is is way, WAY too invested in this for a supposed Canadian. Any mention of election fraud triggers him in the same way that any mention of Ukraine triggers the Two Simpletons.

        4. You do realize the 2000 mules(actually more than that) were not just one time drops. They were people identified with more than 10 drops!

    6. We didn’t … apparently … understand COVID very well either … but in order to “save everyone’s lives”, we destroyed our entire economy and developed a “vaccine” at warp speed. Too bad we don’t consider election fraud to be an existential threat … because it is. Single Party Rule has killed at least 300 million people since the start of the 20th Century. Stopping election fraud should be the #1 priority of every Western Democratic Republic.

      We don’t want to end up with our own Putin or Xi do we? Rulers … for Life.

    7. Couldn’t happen because Democrats ( say the Clintons ) are all for campaign limits.
      Right?

  2. It would not surprise me if HSAA were caught contributing to the Dippers in the names of its members.

  3. There are several possibilities,

    1. Theft. Fraud against the listed contributor. Someone has gotten access to their banking or credit card information, and is criminally siphoning money out of their accounts to ACT BLUE using aliases for the Act Blue Accounts.

    2. Fraud. Someone with lots of money is making hundreds and even thousands of small donations to ACT BLUE using the “contributors” as unknowing dupes. They may have given money once or a dozen times to Act Blue, establishing themselves as fellow travelers, but someone else is using their hundreds or thousands of ID’s to make contributions far in excess of the legal limits.

    Maybe some rich, unscrupulous European billionaire with a shady past, not named George, or some other fanatic Leftist Silicon Valley Billionaire. Maybe it is a group of these and a group of fellow criminals.

    These are just two possibilities off the top of my head.

    1. For possibility #2:

      Maybe this making illegal campaign contributions is their normal, paid, every day job, and the ballot harvesting and ballot fraud is their special, every election year for 3 month jobs.

      The question is who is financing them and how? Is it a secretive political PAC? Is it a “Charitable” NGO? Is the money coming from a foreign entity like an intelligence agency?

      2. I cant see #1. People who contribute upwards of $10k a year to politics have to be few and far between.

        For that first guy … baseball bat and T … I can see him doing it as a day job.

    2. For possibility #1:

      The duped contributors think they are contributing their own money to lots of small worthy charities with names that make them thing they are “rescuing dogs, saving the rainforest, supporting Ukraine, or feeding starving Africans”; but the money is actually going to Act Blue and Socialist Democrat politicians. The “Charity” is just an Act Blue front.

      I have seen stories about supposed charitable emergency crisis funds like Hurricane Ida storm relief were just fronts for Act Blue, and most, but not all your money went to Act Blue, not the hurricane victims or even NGO’s supporting the hurricane victims.

      3. I seem to recall there was a news item a few years ago indicating that many BLM and BLM-adjacent “charities” were in fact well-concealed funnels to Dem SuperPACs. I’m pretty sure Act Blue was mentioned.

  4. O’Keefe makes an inspiring call to action for new citizen journalists. It can and will happen in the U.S., but won’t in Canada for a variety reasons, including the critical fact that a high percentage of Canadians are directly or indirectly on the public payroll. As well, the Dear Leader’s Bill C-11 will allow the federal government, through the CRTC, to shut down any Canadian citizen journalists who would dispute the official narrative of events.

  5. I watched the video. There are contribution records for each name and address, including dates and amounts and organization. James cites examples of over 3,000 individual donations in one year. Some total several hundred thousand dollars. The people at the addresses say they have not made those donations. What we have here is exactly what it seems – election financing fraud.

    We’ll see which agency steps in first to harass James – IRS, FBI, DHS or DOJ.

    1. “The people at the addresses say they have not made those donations. What we have here is exactly what it seems – election financing fraud. ”

      Oh, no no no…Allan S says that’s impossible.The courts haven’t ruled on it yet, you know?

  6. We all know John Fetterman won his his senate seat on the basis of his true connection to the people.
    The debate versus Dr Oz where he mentions,Good night everybody at the beginning of the debate was a classic.
    Nah elections are not rigged, he won on merit !

  7. Believing there is no election fraud is as dumb as believing that no one ever drives 59 mph in a 55 mph zone.

    You have to be a moron like Allan S to believe that a willful choice by the authorities to not enforce the penalties for breaking of a certain law or regulation is proof it is never actually broken.

  8. Remember how we first learned about James O’Keefe?

    He went after ACORN playing as a “pimp with a ‘ho’ on his arm?”

    Now he is going after Act Blue. Except it will not be James alone.

  9. I’ve noticed that no one seems to ask what or whom the Cartels spend their money on. Is the wide open border any indication?

  10. Might someone explain to me the fraud here? … it seems from the video there is no limit on what individual donors can contribute. (it differs in Canada, where there is a max of something like $1600 a year).

    If this is laundering money… then why could that money not be donated directly? What law is this breaking? Are corporations limited in amount they can donate? Sounds like a billionaire is trying to hide where his $$$ goes… but I thought there were few to no limits on amount of donations in America?

    2. Legitimate donors would indeed do that. Perhaps criminal organizations are involved? And not just the Democrat Party. LOL

    3. It could be laundering foreign donations, which is likely why the Dem had the credit card address verification turned off on their 2008 campaign website.

  11. I bet if Justin ever brought up the subject of election funding fraud with his lifelong best friend, Gerald’s response would be: “what a bunch of amateurs”.

    1. “As a life long moron, I object to being associated with Allan S.”

      LOL…he definitely has taken it to a new level, for sure.

      Anyone who will take the time to actually read this: https://www.frontpagemag.com/auditing-bidens-victory/

      (as we know Allan S certainly did not)

      ….and who understands what the term “preponderance of evidence” means can only come to one conclusion. Remember also that this is only an *excerpt* from a book; there is more, much more, to discover if you will only take the time to educate yourself as to what really happened.

      I look at this much like the Covid-19 debacle: even after all the misdirection, obfuscation, threats and denial the truth about the virus, the ‘vaccine’ and Big Pharma is *still* coming out. It has taken a while, but governments all over the world are now admitting what they were vehemently denying only a few months ago. This will be no different…all it takes is one judge with the courage to examine the facts and come to an *honest* conclusion, and the whole house of cards comes crashing down.

Proudly powered by WordPress & Skyrocket Themes

MENU

Navigation