In other words, science as usual: Many [journal] editors are concerned that generative AI could be used to more easily produce fake but convincing articles.
In other words, science as usual: Many [journal] editors are concerned that generative AI could be used to more easily produce fake but convincing articles.
Exactly, so how is that any different from what we get at present?
Yep. Why worry now? These Clown Journals have already published ‘peer reviewed’ impenetrable garbage articles written by bots. And almost every issue contains at least one ‘peer reviewed’ garbage article written by humans about ‘Climate Change’. I doubt AI could do worse.
I don’t look forward to my heart surgeon getting it … mostly right
Journal editors don’t want the competition.
I think the journal editors are more concerned that AI would not have the motive to mislead unless that bias is programed into their data. And, while that scenario is very possible, their primary concern is that the articles would actually be more accurate, and less reflective of the agenda driven tripe that masquerades as science today.
Blame smokers.. Science railroading smokers to bring about social change was the first cut.. But it was for a good cause?.. The problem is it worked.. This opened the door for the world we live in today.. True..
Trust?.. Government funds the scientists and scientists in leftist universities deliver what the government wants..
Monopolies for their friends that so happen to defund their political opponents.. Who promptly “roll over” to stay in the money..
But don’t worry.. They are saving the world?.. The end is nigh :)..
You only have to worry if AI creates a fake pandemic.
Oh, wait.
Fakes like this?
https://twitter.com/stillgray/status/1712513399161237529?
Or this?
https://twitter.com/stillgray/status/1712519530591957259?
Is that a dumpster fire behind Joe in this fake photo?
If so, I might actually believe its real…
Translating Government blather into plain language.
This might be a task,these high priced word processors could manage.
And if you wanted to see AI banned and attacked,what better challenge to set the machine?
Although I wonder what a machine would produce from the verbal diarrhea of the likes of Emperor Justine,the Petulant or Bill Barr?
Also much amusement would arise from translating a CBC “news” report.
LOL it was considered progressive thinking when they replaced retail store clerks with self serve machines. The progressives all sound alike anyway; so will AI really make a difference.