Why this blog?
Until this moment I have been forced to listen while media and politicians alike have told me "what Canadians think". In all that time they never once asked.
This is just the voice of an ordinary Canadian yelling back at the radio -
"You don't speak for me."
email Kate
Goes to a private
mailserver in Europe.
I can't answer or use every tip, but all are appreciated!
Katewerk Art
Support SDA
Paypal:
Etransfers:
katewerk(at)sasktel.net
Not a registered charity.
I cannot issue tax receipts
Favourites/Resources
Instapundit
The Federalist
Powerline Blog
Babylon Bee
American Thinker
Legal Insurrection
Mark Steyn
American Greatness
Google Newspaper Archive
Pipeline Online
David Thompson
Podcasts
Steve Bannon's War Room
Scott Adams
Dark Horse
Michael Malice
Timcast
@Social
@Andy Ngo
@Cernovich
@Jack Posobeic
@IanMilesCheong
@AlinaChan
@YuriDeigin
@GlenGreenwald
@MattTaibbi
Support Our Advertisers
Sweetwater
Polar Bear Evolution
Email the Author
Pilgrim's Progress
How Not To Become A Millenial
Trump The Establishment
Wind Rain Temp
Seismic Map
What They Say About SDA
"Smalldeadanimals doesn't speak for the people of Saskatchewan" - Former Sask Premier Lorne Calvert
"I got so much traffic after your post my web host asked me to buy a larger traffic allowance." - Dr.Ross McKitrick
Holy hell, woman. When you send someone traffic, you send someone TRAFFIC.My hosting provider thought I was being DDoSed. - Sean McCormick
"The New York Times link to me yesterday [...] generated one-fifth of the traffic I normally get from a link from Small Dead Animals." - Kathy Shaidle
"You may be a nasty right winger, but you're not nasty all the time!" - Warren Kinsella
"Go back to collecting your welfare livelihood. - "Michael E. Zilkowsky
Homage to the MSM.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pCwLsXZnFl4
I’ve been saying this for years.
THE MEDIA IS THE ENEMY!
I’ve been saying this for years.
The media needs and enema.
I’ve been saying for years the media is what you get with a successful enema.
They are the public face and tool of the enemy.
Were these Israeli soldiers from the division stationed at Kibbutz Be’eri?
or were these Israeli soldiers from the dancing division stationed at Kibbutz Re’im?
(sarcasm… directed at tier 2 Canada’s own Thomson Reuters, remember this next time you’re paying $800 for a ticket to some Juno Award wannabe at Roy Thompson Hall, ask yourself how many other Israeli solders are in the room)
… or reading The Globe and Mail
Hamas – they are so “humanitarian”.
Yep and don’t forget they inferred the Pali chick that set off a car bomb was a victim of Israeli abuse. They make me sick, literally.
“Yep and don’t forget they inferred the Pali chick that set off a car bomb was a victim of Israeli abuse. ”
Two *free* plastic surgeries is what they call “abuse”? Wow.
(loved their story, though, about how she drove up to the checkpoint and her airbag suddenly deployed *for no reason* (which is impossible) and somehow this managed to ignite the propane cylinder she was carrying inside her car (which is also impossible…)
“They make me sick, literally.”
Me too.
Is this a real screen grab from Reuters Twitter account? Or one of the many fakes out there.
Not that I’m a fan of the MSM.
Reuters can never be trusted….they have been caught many times faking photos and narratives.
Art
I agree Reuters is untrustworthy, but I’m wondering if someone else is faking a Reuters screen.
I couldn’t find the posted screen at Reuters.
Yes, they could have deleted it.
But with the broad SDA readership, I figure someone might have the answer.
They did delete it:
https://twitter.com/Reuters/status/1728605929761861687
JD
Thanks
They airbrushed it out:
https://twitter.com/Reuters/status/1728605929761861687
I’m just waiting for someone to call for the persecution of Israel for the use of child soldiers, since at least one of the persons released was a 4 year old girl
This is a side dish to the main entre…which was Reuters embedding journalists inside Hamas on the day of the initial attack. Reuters admitted this…although they vehemently deny having advanced notice of the attack.
Except Occam’s Razor would suggest that if you have a designated journalist assigned to the event, said journalist would have had to work out a deal with Reuters on how to get paid and for what. You see, Reuters and the other media outlets participating in the attack took the same approach to try and distance themselves from it. They all claimed that the designated journalist was of a free lance nature. Some of the media outlets made a point to publish that they had parted ways with their assignee after the fact. Bean counters at an outlet like Reuters aren’t going purposefully keep themselves in the dark if they’re paying a stringer.
Some years ago I worked for an electronics manufacturer subcontracted by Apple to provide parts for the iPhone. That manufacturer “employed”, knowingly, through three levels of subcontracting cutouts, literal slave labour from China to make the parts.
Somebody did some digging and connected the dots, and both Apple and the manufacturer got serious blowback from it. Apology tours, the whole thing. Nobody was buying the “oh, we just didn’t know” excuse, Apple had to commit to guarantees that no matter how far down the chain, none of their subcontractors could use slave labour.
Reuters embeds stringers with terrorists, which implies prior knowledge of the attacks? NOTHING TO SEE HERE, CONTINUE ON ABOUT YOUR DAILY BUSINESS