Why this blog?
Until this moment I have been forced to listen while media and politicians alike have told me "what Canadians think". In all that time they never once asked.
This is just the voice of an ordinary Canadian yelling back at the radio -
"You don't speak for me."
email Kate
Goes to a private
mailserver in Europe.
I can't answer or use every tip, but all are appreciated!
Katewerk Art
Support SDA
Paypal:
Etransfers:
katewerk(at)sasktel.net
Not a registered charity.
I cannot issue tax receipts
Favourites/Resources
Instapundit
The Federalist
Powerline Blog
Babylon Bee
American Thinker
Legal Insurrection
Mark Steyn
American Greatness
Google Newspaper Archive
Pipeline Online
David Thompson
Podcasts
Steve Bannon's War Room
Scott Adams
Dark Horse
Michael Malice
Timcast
@Social
@Andy Ngo
@Cernovich
@Jack Posobeic
@IanMilesCheong
@AlinaChan
@YuriDeigin
@GlenGreenwald
@MattTaibbi
Support Our Advertisers
Sweetwater
Polar Bear Evolution
Email the Author
Pilgrim's Progress
How Not To Become A Millenial
Trump The Establishment
Wind Rain Temp
Seismic Map
What They Say About SDA
"Smalldeadanimals doesn't speak for the people of Saskatchewan" - Former Sask Premier Lorne Calvert
"I got so much traffic after your post my web host asked me to buy a larger traffic allowance." - Dr.Ross McKitrick
Holy hell, woman. When you send someone traffic, you send someone TRAFFIC.My hosting provider thought I was being DDoSed. - Sean McCormick
"The New York Times link to me yesterday [...] generated one-fifth of the traffic I normally get from a link from Small Dead Animals." - Kathy Shaidle
"You may be a nasty right winger, but you're not nasty all the time!" - Warren Kinsella
"Go back to collecting your welfare livelihood. - "Michael E. Zilkowsky
Wakanda forever, baby.
As I read the article I was thinking that a standard revision is that every historical figure was gay. Then I read it in the last paragraph of the article as humour. Did they also bury a bunch of dead Indian kids at the historical steel plant?
It has occurred to me that there is this new meme about blacks being superior to whoever.
Ok, whatever.
One could call it a racist competition.
To claim one upmanship on constant bases seems to be an error in gene.
While the person and those like her can claim whatever she wants, it does not follow that it is so.
As is often, in the “socials science” circles, you can throw out on the paper whatever bullshit pleases you and you get the notice. The trouble with that is that there is no blowback to demolish completely and utterly the meme if it is not true, for fear of racism.
While the academics will oppose it, they give certain credibility to the meme as though it is something to ruminate about.
It is somewhat of a conundrum, once the bullshit is out, its there and there are those that will pick up on it, as you may have observed a lot.
I found that horses with a goofy expression often were. This must also apply to people. Goofy look, goofy person.
https://profiles.ucl.ac.uk/78422-jenny-bulstrode
King of the ‘suckers’ wants your money for his disastrous investing habits…
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/king-charles-delivers-highly-politicised-speech-support-collectivist-net-zero-project
Not my Monarchy…it passed away with the Queen.
Just where does the BS start and stop when your entire premise is based on BS.. The goal is not historical accuracy but smashing the (enter grievance here) game.. If they are lucky the people getting slighted will get annoyed and they can then be called racists.. Double bonus :)..
I imagine if the Nazi’s had just erased the jews without putting up posters nobody would have noticed.. Funny (not funny) now that works, eh.. Armbands, bad.. Equity programs, good.. Steal all their bagels and take their jobs and they can F.O. on their own time..
Intellectual Yet Idiot, and apparently fascist, racist, Marxist but most of all like the rest – with no skin in the game.
“The Intellectual Yet Idiot is a production of modernity hence has been accelerating since the mid twentieth century, to reach its local supremum today, along with the broad category of people without skin-in-the-game who have been invading many walks of life. Why? Simply, in most countries, the government’s role is between five and ten times what it was a century ago (expressed in percentage of GDP). The IYI seems ubiquitous in our lives but is still a small minority and is rarely seen outside specialized outlets, think tanks, the media, and universities – most people have proper jobs and there are not many openings for the IYI.”
The IYI pathologizes others for doing things he doesn’t understand without ever realizing it is his understanding that may be limited. He thinks people should act according to their best interests and he knows their interests, particularly if they are “red necks” or English non-crisp-vowel class who voted for Brexit. When plebeians do something that makes sense to them, but not to him, the IYI uses the term “uneducated”. What we generally call participation in the political process, he calls by two distinct designations: “democracy” when it fits the IYI, and “populism” when the plebeians dare voting in a way that contradicts his preferences. While rich people believe in one tax dollar one vote, more humanistic ones in one man one vote, Monsanto in one lobbyist one vote, the IYI believes in one Ivy League degree one-vote, with some equivalence for foreign elite schools and PhDs as these are needed in the club.”
https://nassimtaleb.org/2016/09/intellectual-yet-idiot/