When The FBI Does It, That Means That It’s Not Illegal

Eric R Weinstein;

The technical name for this article’s swift and devastating takedown strategy inside the FBI is “Image Cheapening” which we have known since the 1970s via Davidon et al.

We don’t yet know why it was written. We don’t yet know who commissioned it.

We do know that no independent minded health professional who could contradict the public health institutions and czars has been allowed to ascend to @hubermanlab’s level of popularity, power and influence without “Image Cheapening” coverage.

In fact, since Lindbergh used his popularity to sway public opinion on entry into WWII, no independent minded individual has been amassed state-level influence without such FUD (Fear-Uncertainty-Doubt) campaigns. The theory we have advanced behind this is that the State learned the lesson from Lindbergh’s interference with FDR that all charismatic independent minded individuals (like a John Lennon) cannot be allowed state levels of influence and must be preemptively cheapened and harassed. Here it is applied to medical professionals who could interfere with future Anthony Fauci health czars. […]

I have been warning people about this since the 1980s and did so more actively on Twitter 2011-2017. I think I will keep posting this old thread more often to remind our friends in the USG that this has been anticipated.

This was always coming. And it will always take the apparent form of independent voices in places like Nature, The Lancet, The LA Times, Harvard, the NAS.

Everyone you could turn to when you need to question the state will have been preemptively splattered with feces.

Learn the pattern of Seberging. The ‘tells’ are relentless mockery, private life invasion and FUD against independent minded people of influence through ostensibly non state actors.

I know this was long. Thanks for your time.

10 Replies to “When The FBI Does It, That Means That It’s Not Illegal”

  1. “in other words authority to be experienced in that law area of courts”

    It pays not to overstep one’s knowledge.

  2. am l getting this right?, er, ‘right’?
    SDA is actually PROTESTING and objecting to the fact j edgar hoover was a dangerous power mad despot who abused the rights of the likes of John Lennon?
    (nothing nice to say about that bug eyed monster)
    the times they are a changin’ la la la

    1. Ahh, engaging in a spot of social engineering, are we?

      Well then, a big sloppy wet raspberry in your general direction.

    2. the FBI has been a blackmail and influence operation for all of it’s existence, which many people have known since at least the 70s church commission.

      1. Agreed. The FBI went after the mafia with everything it had because there’s only room for one huge criminal organization in the US. For decades no President of the US dared to touch J Edgar Hoover.

  3. In the case of Brett Kavanaugh – when they couldn’t find any dirt on him in his past to smear him with they made one up.
    Easy Peasy.

  4. I would occasionally read articles like these and wonder why. Never quite thought about it in terms presented. Amazing.

    1. If Jean Seberg had married F. Scott Fitzgerald, would she have been C. Berg Fitzgerald?

Navigation