Margin Of Fraud

Testimony from the disbarment hearing for Jeffrey Clark;

Mark Wingate, a Fulton County Elections Board member, testifies that he voted against certifying the 2020 election because the county did not verify the signatures on 147,000 mail-in ballots.

“I asked what did we do for signature verification? And the comment I got back frankly floored me, ‘We didn’t do any.'”

Additionally, the county could not provide any chain of custody documentation or surveillance footage for mail-in ballots or ballot drop boxes.

“I and other board members had requested that we obtain the chain of custody documentation from the department and none of that was ever delivered.”

“There was never any surveillance tape, an inch of footage delivered to the board.”

31 Replies to “Margin Of Fraud”

    1. Right, no fraud whatsoever. How many dishonest people were in on the steal? Those who were responsible for making sure the election was honest were the most dishonest.

  1. ‘pot calling kettle black’
    well Willis IS in fact the BLACK pot pointing at kettle aka scapegoat Wingate
    how do things of THIS import, get to THIS point????
    l am however beside myself with glee, a firm adherent to the concept of Karma
    happening to the dei player

  2. I’m a manmade climate change denier … no such thing exists
    I’m a “transgender” denier … no such thing exists
    I’m an Ukraine is winning the war against Russia denier … as Ukraine, NATO, and Biden have LOST
    and
    I’m an election denier … ever since COVID institutionalized election cheating

        1. “Don’t be daft. Russia has taken what it wanted.”

          They have, despite all the hand-wringing anguish from the Simpletons ™ and their ilk. They won’t be giving it up, either, unless offered terms of their own choosing.

        2. Some people won’t believe that Ukraine has lost until the man on the TV tells them so.

      1. “If Ukraine had lost it would be occupied by Russia. I haven’t seen that on the news”

        If Ukraine had won, the Russians would have been driven back across the border into Russia. I haven’t seen that on the news.

  3. I googled Fulton County, not knowing my American geography. Assuming it’s Atlanta, Georgia …

    https://bestneighborhood.org/conservative-vs-liberal-map-fulton-county-ga/

    “Highly educated populations with bachelor’s degrees or higher tend to vote for more liberal candidates. In Fulton County, 57.77% of all adults have earned a bachelor’s degree or higher. Educated women are far less likely to vote for conservatives, and in Fulton County women make up 52.62% of the population.”

    “Older Americans tend to vote more conservatively. Members of the Boomer and Silent generations (born 1928-1964) more often vote for Republicans while GenX, Millennials (born 1965-1996) and younger generations consistently support Democrats. The median age in Fulton County is 38.7, which is older than the national median age of 38.1.”

    So what happens to highly educated populations as they get older? Also, “highly educated”? How about “those with high student debt tend to vote Democrat”.

    I might be creating my own thread here.

    1. When I read or hear “highly educated” I actually read or hear “highly indoctrinated”.

      I’d have a “critical thinking skills debate” with them but when I say or write “critical thinking skills debate” I actually mean gun fight.

    2. my GINORMOUS MAJOR ISSUE with student loans, is the assumption the whole debt is forgiven? why not some upper limit plus everybody still owes *something* and credit status reflects the balance. or perhaps more reflected by the balance.

      a lesson is CON-SE-QUEN-CES

  4. Don’t worry, Jeffery Clark will receive an appropriate punishment, based on no conviction in any court of law, unlike Kleinsmith

  5. In case you are unaware, just prior to the 2020 election, Georgia relaxed their voting requirements. Among other things, it allowed precincts to put out as many drop boxes as they wanted. Some locations put out dozens. Additionally, there were no requirements (as there had been prior to 2020) to check authenticity on mail in ballot operations other than signature and date of birth. Now, however, they have restored the old “rules” and actually enhanced them somewhat. Mail in ballots not only require a matched signature…they, also, require a valid identification to to acquire the ballot. Jurisdictions can now only have one drop box per precinct which will be monitored. There are quite a few other things restored…but the bottom line is that the community organizers and Democrat party are really whining….which suggests it’s a good thing.

    1. Thanks for that update, Orson; some of this background info tends to get lost in the day to day ‘noise’. 🙂

    2. Ruby will safe the day again, but now she needs to run the same batches of hand picked ballots 10 times through the machines and not just 3 times like last time. This time they will know where the cameras are so they will have a convenient malfunction and they know the legal system had let them go last time so this year be a repeat. All people who pointed out that running the same ballots through the machines 3 times got sued for defamation and lost thanks to Fani.

  6. There is no doubt in my mind that in the last US election in the 4 named states illegal ballots were fraudulently counted!
    What’s going to happen this election?

    1. Well, consider this. All this messy cheating on so many levels…what if you could avoid the difficulty altogether? A few years ago I wouldn’t even have suggested this as a possibility. But, we’ve seen the lengths they will actually go…so, strap in:

      The certification of the election results on the state level is done by the Secretary of State. We’ve seen three Secretary(s) of State actually pull Trump off the ballot because (as the Maine SoS put it, IMO Trump is not fit for the position). Colorado’s Secretary of State took, very much, the same position. They didn’t have a leg to stand on, but they pulled him from the ballot anyway. So, what’s to stop someone of that mentality of just fudging the election totals and certifying whomever they want. States like Arizona actually sent out a letter to precincts telling them that they would be disciplined (IOW charged) if they actually did a manual count of votes in their jurisdiction.

      Outlandish…sure. But, right now I can think of three partisan Secretary(s) of State in battleground states who have the capacity to do something like this (Michigan, Wisconsin, Arizona to name a few).

      1. That’s what I was afraid of! The world’s greatest Democracy is failing!

    1. Didn’t that morbidly obese “Republican” bagpiper CERTIFY his “thorough” investigation of the 2020 election? The entire Justice Dept. and the office of the AG claimed the US had the most certifiable of certified elections in the HISTORY of American certifications. It had a perfect election.

      Just imagine what a Democrat Biden Justice Dept. and corrupt AG will certify in 2024.

    2. “Most secure election in history.

      Until somebody investigates.”

      Yes, which is why the Democrats spent *millions* to stop as many of those investigations as they could. Who does that? Who loudly proclaims that there was no fraud and no cheating, but then fights tooth and nail to prevent anyone from proving that? NO ONE who isn’t trying desperately to hide the fact that they cheated, that’s who.

  7. The way to counter the vote of an aging and increasingly conservative population,
    is to harness the fear of growing old, common amongst the barren sex,
    with being broke/woke, common amongst younger beta males.

    If snailmail is a legitimate means of voting, when is email going to be legitimized as a voting option,
    as who uses snailmail over email apres Y2K ?

    A neighbour often opines about why decisions of importance in our governance are not made by online referendum, rather than by nitwits selected by party members and elected by party numbers.
    Why are ‘cast’ votes considered more real/reliable than online polls in this transday and transage ?

    Life Follows Art dept.
    A Serious Man – The Uncertainty Principle
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S_dDCPQoMB4

    .

  8. If you show this to people that have TDS they will call you stupid and Fanni Willis “specially trained” , “learned” and “honourable” and then refuse to read it.

    FJB is going to cheat his way back into office.

Navigation