Why this blog?
Until this moment I have been forced to listen while media and politicians alike have told me "what Canadians think". In all that time they never once asked.
This is just the voice of an ordinary Canadian yelling back at the radio -
"You don't speak for me."
email Kate
Goes to a private
mailserver in Europe.
I can't answer or use every tip, but all are appreciated!
Katewerk Art
Support SDA
Paypal:
Etransfers:
katewerk(at)sasktel.net
Not a registered charity.
I cannot issue tax receipts
Favourites/Resources
Instapundit
The Federalist
Powerline Blog
Babylon Bee
American Thinker
Legal Insurrection
Mark Steyn
American Greatness
Google Newspaper Archive
Pipeline Online
David Thompson
Podcasts
Steve Bannon's War Room
Scott Adams
Dark Horse
Michael Malice
Timcast
@Social
@Andy Ngo
@Cernovich
@Jack Posobeic
@IanMilesCheong
@AlinaChan
@YuriDeigin
@GlenGreenwald
@MattTaibbi
Support Our Advertisers
Sweetwater
Polar Bear Evolution
Email the Author
Pilgrim's Progress
How Not To Become A Millenial
Trump The Establishment
Wind Rain Temp
Seismic Map
What They Say About SDA
"Smalldeadanimals doesn't speak for the people of Saskatchewan" - Former Sask Premier Lorne Calvert
"I got so much traffic after your post my web host asked me to buy a larger traffic allowance." - Dr.Ross McKitrick
Holy hell, woman. When you send someone traffic, you send someone TRAFFIC.My hosting provider thought I was being DDoSed. - Sean McCormick
"The New York Times link to me yesterday [...] generated one-fifth of the traffic I normally get from a link from Small Dead Animals." - Kathy Shaidle
"You may be a nasty right winger, but you're not nasty all the time!" - Warren Kinsella
"Go back to collecting your welfare livelihood. - "Michael E. Zilkowsky
@Kate- You first
You DO realize that Kate’s pithy headlines are an intelligence test, and you just failed?
You DO realize the /sarc tag was implied?
You do realize there’s no “sarcasm” font? I’ve seen a lot of flak over the years because of that.
I’m very glad to hear that you weren’t being serial.
That means it’s working. If you’re dumb enough to take what the satanic government is offering because the TV got you scared then whatever.
Are they still doing this, I haven’t heard anything, but then I don’t do mainstream media..
https://www.westernstandard.news/news/alberta-updates-mrna-booster-guidance-to-every-three-months-starting-with-six-month-old-babies/53832
Where are these decisions coming from? I can’t imagine Smith and her party support this. BC is still demanding vaxed for health care workers. There is no justification for this.
The usual suspects will claim that increases in rates of autism, cancer, dementia, stroke, heart attack, myocarditis, multiple sclerosis are all nothing to see here, folks, move along.
Don’t forget Long Covid, which is either 95% or 98% associated with the clot shot. But ADE is an anti-science idea spread by anti-science heretics who don’t bow before the Science, so don’t mention it.
From your lips to The Elites’s ears:
https://www.nih.gov/news-events/nih-research-matters/mrna-vaccine-treat-pancreatic-cancer
More work is needed to understand why half the people did not have a strong immune response to their personalized vaccines. The researchers are currently planning to launch a larger clinical trial of the vaccine.
And yet more!
“Can mRNA Vaccines Help Treat Cancer?
Subscribe
January 20, 2022, by Edward Winstead
A technician in full body protective gear adjusting a machine for making mRNA vaccines.
A technician working on mRNA vaccine production.
Credit: Image used with permission from BioNTech
The coronavirus pandemic has thrown a spotlight on messenger RNA (mRNA)—the molecule that carries a cell’s instructions for making proteins. Hundreds of millions of people worldwideExit Disclaimer have received mRNA vaccines that provide powerful protection against severe COVID-19 caused by infection with SARS-CoV-2.
As stunningly successful as the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines have been, researchers have long hoped to use mRNA vaccines for a very different purpose—to treat cancer. mRNA-based cancer treatment vaccines have been tested in small trials for nearly a decade, with some promising early results.
In fact, scientists at both Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna drew on their experience developing mRNA cancer vaccines to create their coronavirus vaccines. Now, some investigators believe the success of the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines could help accelerate clinical research on mRNA vaccines to treat cancer.”
https://www.cancer.gov/news-events/cancer-currents-blog/2022/mrna-vaccines-to-treat-cancer
Well, if they can change the meaning of “vaccine” (circa 2018) then they can change the meaning of “help treat”. So the answer is “Sure, they can help easy your pain!”
Yeah….I’ve been hearing this about mRNA vaccines curing cancer since at least 2000. No progress. It doesn
t work. It likely never will work.
There has indeed been a dramatic rise in the rate of cancer among young people. But it’s a 30-year trend, so the anti-COVID-vaxxers can put away their pitchforks.
https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2022/09/researchers-report-dramatic-rise-in-early-onset-cancers/
It could be that we are getting much better at detecting cancer in younger people.
The trend started in 1990. Guess what else started right around 1990?
That would be cell phones.
Surely you’re not suggesting that non ionizing radiation is a problem are you?
https://rumble.com/v2c43vc-the-types-of-cancers-we-most-have-to-worry-about-with-5g.html
And, yet more:
https://youtu.be/0RIskTMLV40?si=A6DYTPYVud9W7azb
I thought you were going to blame the internet.
So tell me everything wrong with this publication. Where is it weak and worthless?
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38583833/
Review: N1-methyl-pseudouridine (m1Ψ): Friend or foe of cancer?
“Evidence is provided that adding 100 % of N1-methyl-pseudouridine (m1Ψ) to the mRNA vaccine in a melanoma model stimulated cancer growth and metastasis, while non-modified mRNA vaccines induced opposite results, thus suggesting that COVID-19 mRNA vaccines could aid cancer development.”
Good old Fat Rodent. Still disparaging discussion on the issue and ensuring broadcast of the narrative.
https://www.cureus.com/articles/196275-increased-age-adjusted-cancer-mortality-after-the-third-mrna-lipid-nanoparticle-vaccine-dose-during-the-covid-19-pandemic-in-japan#!/
Yes, one smells a rat.
Scientists were pointing out that mRNA spike was epigenetically downregulating the tumor-suppressing action of p53 and BRCA since before the outset of the vaxgene rollout. This was one of the reasons I avoided them, seeing there was no RCT testing for this in the published rollout literature for the synthetic mRNA spike vaxgenes. As Francis Bacon declared in 1620, empirical science trumps rhetoric (the method of anticipations). Research has since shows it’s specifically the S2 subunit of mRNA spike that has this particular carcigenic effect.
“SARS-CoV-2 spike S2 subunit inhibits p53 activation of p21(WAF1), TRAIL Death Receptor DR5 and MDM2 proteins in cancer cells”https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.04.12.589252v1
The pseudouridine in the synthetic mRNA spike evidently has an independent cancer mechanism as well.
“ Review: N1-methyl-pseudouridine (m1Ψ): Friend or foe of cancer?”
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0141813024022323
Dr. Jessica Rose (PhD) on substack has been reviewing published science papers on various carcigenic mechanisms of synthetic mRNA spike.
Maybe you should read the paper before posting about it. It’s extraordinarily weak, and I wonder how it got published.
All the paper really says is that the mortality rates of some (but not all) cancers rose during the pandemic. The paper tried to tie that to COVID vaccines, but presented no sound evidence for that, other than the fact that they occurred over roughtly the same period. In particular, the paper did not compare cancer rates of the vaccinated to the unvaccinated, which you would think would be the bare minimum for establishing causation.
I wonder how it got published
I suspect it was thoroughly peer reviewed. Just like this study on MASSIVE RAT GENITALS.
Reasonable people can disagree on whether a single research study is partcularly convincing. The reason we keep laughing at you is that you insist on ignoring the weight of evidence that the entire edifice of scientific inquiry is rotten to the foundations.
1. You have a fixation on massive rat genitals. You may want to discuss that with your analyst.
2. Judging from all the (unfunny) insults I get, the anti-vaxxers don’t laugh at me, they hate me. I presume this is because they don’t know how else to react to disagreement.
3. The “edifice of scientific inquiry” is by no means perfect, but for all its flaws it’s better than anything the anti-vaxxers have to offer. At any rate, that leaves you defending a scientific paper while claiming current science is useless.
That’s not a fixation. It’s a weekly lunch special.
Maybe before you criticize all “anti-vaxers”, you may want to search for Aaron Siri’s investigations into the FDA and there relationships with pharma, the revolving door, funding, vaccine guidance meeting recordings, what the FDA calls a placebo controlled study and this just scratches the surface. Remember that since 1986 the pharmaceutical companies are free from vaccine harm lawsuits. If that is not a red flag for possible examination, there is no hope for you. Quit exclusively deferring to authorities and try listening to those using basic logic. This would have gotten you to the truth about Covid much more quickly than waiting for experts or studies. They take a long time to catch up.
Maybe before you criticize those supporting the COVID vaccines, you should read the numerous independent large-scale controlled scientific studies that have examined the safety and efficiecy of the vaccines. The vast preponderance of them find the vaccines to be acceptably safe and effective. Like this one studying adverse effects, involving almost 100 million subjects:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X24001270
So whatever you may think of the FDA and the pharmaceutical companies, these vaccines do work.
I read that the cancer outbreak is due to the “forever chemicals” in all the plastic packaging. But your Cheerios are THE WORST! We MUST ban all plastics!! Now!! Plastics are KILLING the children, the elderly, and the underserved. No … plastic “forever chemical” death from heinous cancers doesn’t appear to affect rich white men … just the victim classes. Ohhhhhhhh mommmmaaaa … there are nanoplastics everywhere! One billionth of a gram of plastics are killing you!! The micro-nano plastics are EVERYWHERE!! The only way to survive is to SHUT DOWN everything. STOP capitalist society NOW! That’s what will SAVE us all … I read it in The Daily Mail.
So don’t worry my fellow injected white, old, male, COVID survivors … we will survive “forever chemicals” too !!
Kenji, once again, you are not panicking enough. WE MUST BAN ALL THE THINGS!!!!
Except computers, wifi, cell-phones, and tablets. Because they help tell us all the things we should ban.
I remember reading, from multiple sources during the roll out of the Phizer Jibber-jab that alot of people that were in the know about MRNA were warning that if you take the Jibber-Jab just once , you’ll have to take it repeatedly for the rest of your life, otherwise you’re going to end up getting cancer.
Estimated 250,000 deaths each year due to medical errors.
https://wilsonlaw.com/blog/medical-errors-third-leading-cause-of-death-in-the-united-states/
I wonder if that is high or low for the nations that have “free health care”?
I suspect far, far, higher. When the patient is a cost, and a not a source of revenue, it makes more “sense” to try ot kill them off.
God help us. Lest capitalisation rules confuse, I called upon God.
Or they don’t get treated at all and live longer because they never see doctors. I saw a doctor 35 years ago because of physical injury. I’ve managed to avoid them even since. If I lived somewhere where I had access to a medical system I’d probably be on life long prescriptions for the this that and the other and I’d be getting slowly killed by big pharma.
The deaths weren’t due to medical errors … they were due to capitalism. The capitalist medical system supplies health care based on demands for health care. And when demand outpaces supply of quality medical care … then the care suffers. The Doctors take short cuts. It’s all because of “the profit motive” by greedy Doctors.
How do I know this? It’s what Obama told all the dim witted Americans when he extolled the virtues of Canadian Socialized (read: Socialist) medicine. If you like your Doctor to remember your name and ailment, then you can keep your Communist Doctor. But once your Doctor is getting a steady government check … and doesn’t have to worry about malpractice insurance rates … he’ll leave a sponge inside you as he lets a Nuring student sew you up. He can’t be bothered. He’s off to a government medical conference in Phuket … where he will be treating the native girls … for FREE.
In Canada these days millions no longer have a “family doctor”, yes the system is just that good. s/
Before ‘Universal MediCare’ there was MotherCare.
How does a culture survive, if all the ‘smartest’ women are working outside jobs, and have no time for
procreation ?
How do you say “the clot-shot killed me” without actually saying it?