18 Replies to “O, Sweet Saint Of San Andreas”

  1. Why not just cut to the chase and execute people who commit counter-revolutionary activity?

    Chances are they’re irredeemable, so why bother with trials and rehab and social agencies and all that BS, just snuff ’em.

    The kid in the link is seven years old and already on the wrong path, do the entire family, it’s for the good of the community.

    Run this idea up the progressive flagpole. (pissed-off sarc)

  2. Wait, so her own mom turned her in when the kid brought the picture home? Did i read that right?
    And now mom is upset that her daughter has no rights?

    1. l reread the article seems the offender gave the drawing to a friend who took it home and that friends mom filed the initial complaint
      ‘how’ those words are RAYYYYYYCYYYYYYYST beyond me but it is 2024

  3. I suspect that eventually the education system in states like California are going to create a new “animal.” Home schooling is becoming more popular. And, the requirements to home school in California are still minimal by their standards. So, don’t be surprised to see large groups of home schooler form their own “schools.” Technically, they wouldn’t be under the same regulations that Charter and Private schools face. And, as long as the parents stay within regulations of home schooling it doesn’t distinguish domicile set ups.

    I suspect we’ll see actual schools being taught by parents (and guest teachers) on a massive level.

  4. All I can say is the Capistrano School District is far too close to my two grandson’s school district. Far too close. Gonna have to home school those sweet little boys.

    How dare that Principal use the name of Jesus. How dare he.

    1. dontcha know k, that’d be hey-souse of nazareth.
      related:
      anybody know how many mohameds we got wandering the planet?
      maybe l should yell out the name next time lm at the mall
      count the heads turning as a rough estimate.

  5. Time for all decent folks to get out of the state and leave the place to the derelicts, drug addicts and the Hollywood wokies. And the religious lunatics like Tom Cruise and the Scientologists. Does anyone actually care what happens in this dump called California any more? It will always be something ridiculous and stupid.

    1. the number of cults have come out of that state so far is very very shocking.
      its like they succeeded building a ponzi scheme or wtf.
      if l meet mr cruise in a dark alley l will congratulate him on a remarkable acting career esp the stuff about doing his own stunts.
      then pound the bejeezuz out of him reminding him each blow is a family devastated by the miscavige gang.

      1. Agreed. It’s stunning to realize that in the early 1990s there were more than 100,000 Scientologists worldwide. It’s even more depressing to know that in 1988 Dianetics topped the US Best Seller lists by an organized book-buying campaign.

        And Scientology was only one of a host of fraudulent cults to come out of California. Lamentably we are far too late to actually beat the crap out of the author of all this fraud: L Ron Hubbard. He died in 1986,

    1. Yup.
      In the US, it pays to always video record any interaction with the cops.
      If they get caught violating your rights, your looking at an easy 100K$+.
      I bet you could get very, very rich by flipping them off, getting arrested for it, filming it all and suing.
      In Canada, however, all you’ll get for suing is retaliation.

  6. School boards need to be eliminated or overtaken by rational adults who will fire woke teachers and principals.

  7. Uh… the Supreme Court has already ruled that minors have the same first amendment rights and protections as adults, so the ruling here is patently wrong.

    1. Outside of school maybe. When I was in high school there was a big stink about random searches of cars and lockers. Once you’re on school property, you have no rights.

      1. Random searches are a fourth amendment issue, and the argument there is that the searches are being conducted on school property, thus they have the ability to give themselves permission to search.

        I don’t like it either, but it’s a different barrel of worms.

        This is the school specifically telling a student she isn’t allowed to engage in artistic expression, which the Supreme Court has already given a massive NO to.

Navigation