23 Replies to “A Liberal Government “Intersectional Analysis””

  2. In case you didn’t notice.. They can say anything they want and nobody calls them on it.. No wait, they want you to call them on it, so they can call you racist.. Poke, poke, poke..

    Forests burn, its what they do.. The wood comes out one of two ways.. Ash or lumber.. Window box / plant a tree politics, ignores the fact that trees grow like weeds.. Its why we have forests..

    Awful people squatting on a situation they have no control over.. = Liberal policy.. Let it burn..

  7. If the so called first nations didn’t colonize the Americas, they wouldn’t experience this problem.

    And muzzies are bothered by heat?

    If muzzies stopped producing oil and gas there’d be fewer problems.

  8. Peter says Government more affected by inbreeding, laziness, low I.Q., neuroses, excessive emotion, lack of critical thinking and everything else that makes certain humans totally deficient and useless.

    Where’s my Nobel Prize?

  9. What!!???
    They left out the LGBQ crowd, fat people, short people, and left-handed Albanian dental assistants.
    Oh, the cruelty!!
    The inhumanity!
    How dare they ignore the suffering endured by other groups anxious to jump on the Intersectionality gravy train. (Grievance train?)

  11. Breaking News in BC. The BCU party has stepped out of the election to throw support behind the BC Conservative Party. Good on them. That could just get rid of the NDP, again, for a while.

    1. BC dude here. Yeah, that is an interesting move by Falcon.
      Turf the NDP is good, but don’t expect a “conservative” correction.
      I will vote merely on the promise that Rustad will fire Bonny Henry, the evil one.
      Otherwise, I am enjoying seeing the BC lefties melt down over their potential loss of “safe supply” (i.e. enabling zombies), their fear of white colonial redux (i.e. enough perversion), and their fear of more climate change (i.e., economic sense via resource development).
      Have a nice day.

  13. Muslims? In Canada, most live in the larger cities that are rarely bothered by wildfires except for the smoke.

  15. Well it does create employment! Light it…then get hired to fight it.
    It’s worked well for years.

  16. There are two choices. Don’t live up in the bush in the middle of high risk forest fire territory or if they don’t like being evacuated when the fire comes choose not to evacuate. Fires will come, like it or not. Eventually all these groups have to make a choice one way or the other and secondly they need to stop bellyaching about past events and trying to blame for past traumas. I recall groups evacuated to the city complaining because the provided food wasn’t what they were accustomed to and the venues provided did not provide enough entertainment. What did they think it was? – a summer vacation with free room and board? How about a little gratitude instead to the people who gave up use of those venues for them? I don’t hear the people in Jasper complaining about such trivia and for them watching their homes burn is every bit as traumatic if not more because they have bought and paid for them themselves.

  17. mussies in downtown toronto. no way.

    as for indigenous. more affected by the ones they light . never more than 50 meters off the road.

  18. Well, gov, take a look at my concerned face.

    ^ ^
    .. ..

    — concern, worry, fear

  20. Ohhhhhhhhhhh mommmaaaaaaaaa …

    We’re VICTIMS of the white mans global warmed forest fires !
    but
    We’re PERPETRATORS of Christian Church burnings.

    Now … intersect … THAT!

  21. spotted a cpl greenies resting in the shade provided by trees next to city hall.

    in the conversation l confidently surmised in the whatever million years Paleolithic Age even once probably a particularly dry spell the lightning and half north america burns. until rain quashes it saves east coast deciduous forests.
    oh dear all that CO2 what to do.
    she had no answer.

Proudly powered by WordPress & Skyrocket Themes

MENU

Navigation