Why this blog?
Until this moment I have been forced to listen while media and politicians alike have told me "what Canadians think". In all that time they never once asked.
This is just the voice of an ordinary Canadian yelling back at the radio -
"You don't speak for me."
email Kate
Goes to a private
mailserver in Europe.
I can't answer or use every tip, but all are appreciated!
Katewerk Art
Support SDA
Paypal:
Etransfers:
katewerk(at)sasktel.net
Not a registered charity.
I cannot issue tax receipts
Favourites/Resources
Instapundit
The Federalist
Powerline Blog
Babylon Bee
American Thinker
Legal Insurrection
Mark Steyn
American Greatness
Google Newspaper Archive
Pipeline Online
David Thompson
Podcasts
Steve Bannon's War Room
Scott Adams
Dark Horse
Michael Malice
Timcast
@Social
@Andy Ngo
@Cernovich
@Jack Posobeic
@IanMilesCheong
@AlinaChan
@YuriDeigin
@GlenGreenwald
@MattTaibbi
Support Our Advertisers
Sweetwater
Polar Bear Evolution
Email the Author
Pilgrim's Progress
How Not To Become A Millenial
Trump The Establishment
Wind Rain Temp
Seismic Map
What They Say About SDA
"Smalldeadanimals doesn't speak for the people of Saskatchewan" - Former Sask Premier Lorne Calvert
"I got so much traffic after your post my web host asked me to buy a larger traffic allowance." - Dr.Ross McKitrick
Holy hell, woman. When you send someone traffic, you send someone TRAFFIC.My hosting provider thought I was being DDoSed. - Sean McCormick
"The New York Times link to me yesterday [...] generated one-fifth of the traffic I normally get from a link from Small Dead Animals." - Kathy Shaidle
"You may be a nasty right winger, but you're not nasty all the time!" - Warren Kinsella
"Go back to collecting your welfare livelihood. - "Michael E. Zilkowsky
I’m not confident she understands what “sanctity” means in this particular context.
A bit like the sanctity of her cookie.
That is in violation of unreasonable searches and seizures.
~~~ Fourth Amendment
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
~~~
She is a complete and utter imbecile. She’s making crap up again.
She’s not making it up. This is what she and her fellow travellers actual think they should be able to do. And as for the Constitution and Bill of Rights, those were derived from God and thus illegitimate in the eyes of these Marxists. That’s why they have no compunction about violating rights, and are ammoral.
Wish in one hand and take a dump in the other. Tell me which one fills up first.
Wishing for something DOES NOT make it true.
The 4th is a guaranteed right.
Guaranteed by whom? You are not paying attention.
Of course I am.
I was and am aware of the 4th and the 2nd.
Fearing cackling morons that grab attention by being ridiculously stupid is for the faint of heart.
Marxists believe the government Is god.
Immoral, not amoral.
Both.
The second amendment exists for just such an occasion.
Well … I’m guessing she FAILED her BAR exam the first time … because she missed every question pertaining to the US Constitution. Willie Brown had to give her the answers the second time. Just like she got the questions to the ABC debate, err pile-on Trump ahead of time.
What Bill of Rights?
Hey now.. The community has decided you don’t have any rights anymore.. Do it for grandma, the children.. Do it for Covid 19.. They need special powers to harass their enemies, errr, I mean keep us all safe.. That’s it, safe..
My PCP actually asked me if I had any guns in my house … speaking of invasive. I believe I spontaneously devised a way to say GFY in more polite terms.
I’ve no idea why you would respond in polite fashion. My GP would/should expect to be fired on the spot.
As if the federal government even understands the word “responsible”. Harris is a fascist. Democrats are fascists.
“Responsible” gun owner means Registered Democrat gun owner doncha know?
If they ‘walk in’ to the sanctity of a home, they may find them selves staring down the barrel of one of those sacrosanct blasters. What fool will take the job of going into those homes against the home owners wishes?
Police don’t have to follow illegal orders.
Except they almost always do, unfortunately.
Cops follow illegal orders all the time. Remember COVID? Again, you are not paying attention.
If you chose to follow the covid dictates, YOU weren’t paying attention.
I got no shots and wore no mask. And won’t be doing so.
Almost every cop in the world. You are not paying attention.
They mock MAGA by saying deporting 10 million illegals is impossible. Confiscating 200+ million guns will be easy.
And they can build 3,000,000 homes in about a minute.
Welcome to the reality in Australia…
Australia is a third world shithole. Bad comparison.
So’s Canada. A firearms officer can come in with sufficient notice.
That’s what I thought.
“So’s Canada. A firearms officer can come in with sufficient notice.”
Yes, anyone the government wishes to send can come in…there is no requirement for them to be police. And not just to search for guns…to search for *records* of guns, going through all your personal papers and you computer. You MUST assist in this search, too.
(all this came courtesy of Bill C-68, decades ago…)
Penal colony to penalty state
Daft authoritarian twat.
But I’m glad she’s opened her piehole.
Put that in an ad.
Dame and Dumber
How’d that work out for the British 250 years ago?
In Canada, the relevant law is the Firearms Act of 1995, section 102, where a firearms officer of the provincial government can at any reasonable time enter any place that they believe has more than 10 guns, a prohibited gun, a gun collection, or documents relating to a gun collection. They’re not allowed to use violence to enter, but if refused, they can get a warrant. They’re allowed to open any container, inspect any firearm, and demand any records. It’s for your own good, don’t you see?
They have to provide written warning.
Of course, they will never look any where critical, such as twice convicted murderers.
“…any place that they believe…”
Probably best to get them to get a warrant. At least they have to convince a judge.
Who’s the Nazi?
“What do you like about Kamala?”
I mean, besides the blowjobs?