Heh.
WOW!PRICELESS!Hillary Clinton Stooge and Lackey George Stephanopoulos regrets asking Mr Trump Do you have any regrets!Mr Trump Demolish Him! pic.twitter.com/Tq5fDl0yF3
— TRUMP ANOMALY (@ANOMALY1) October 30, 2016
Heh.
WOW!PRICELESS!Hillary Clinton Stooge and Lackey George Stephanopoulos regrets asking Mr Trump Do you have any regrets!Mr Trump Demolish Him! pic.twitter.com/Tq5fDl0yF3
— TRUMP ANOMALY (@ANOMALY1) October 30, 2016
Laws are for the little people.
Trump is an unknown. But, to channel Donald Rumsfeld, Hillary is the most known known in the history of knowns. And what we know of her is that she’s stinkingly corrupt, above the law, and able to suborn entire government agencies in the cause of her corruption. Where do you think we’re gonna be after eight years of that?
Oh, and it will be eight years.
More: Outrage or genius?
Tonight was like a geriatric version of "8 Mile". pic.twitter.com/mrdZJe3l4C
— Bill Schulz (@BillSchulz) October 10, 2016
Only a few days ago an official United Nations’ news site exhorted the world to DEFEAT Trump and pushed a pro Clinton website before deleting its Tweet. How can you blame them for worrying? Their nails must be bitten down to the quick.
Michael Barone: … on reflection and looking over the transcript, I think Trump did a fairly good job of discouraging marginal voters from voting for Clinton, more than I appreciated as I watched the debate.
Related analysis from the always fascinating Scott Adams.
Come to Daddy…
“These are the reasons why I will vote for Donald Trump for president.”
Aaaannd… Minnesota moves into toss up territory.
MN Gov Dayton To His Citizens: Don’t Like Immigrants, GET OUT Of Minnesota!
https://t.co/GdFu6uPIVe #BanIslam #MAGA pic.twitter.com/eEgr72i2cR— Deplorable Me 😎 (@LeahR77) September 19, 2016
Politico: All told, Trump is approaching, and has possibly already passed, $100 million from donors who have given less than $200, according to an analysis of available Federal Election Commission filings, the campaign’s public statements and people familiar with his fundraising operation. It is a threshold no previous Republican has ever achieved in a single campaign. And Trump has done so less than three months after signing his first email solicitation for donors on June 21 — a staggering speed to collect such a vast sum.
Trolled, again.
The media showed up to the presidential ballroom of the new Trump International Hotel on Friday morning expecting Donald Trump to take questions about whether he still questions if President Obama was born in the United States.
Hey journalism — how do you like your new status as punchline?
If you haven’t noticed, our side has been losing consistently since 1988. We can win midterms, but we do nothing with them. Call ours Hannibalic victories. After the Carthaginian’s famous slaughter of a Roman army at Cannae, he failed to march on an undefended Rome, prompting his cavalry commander to complain: “you know how to win a victory, but not how to use one.” And, aside from 2004’s lackluster 50.7%, we can’t win the big ones at all.
Because the deck is stacked overwhelmingly against us. I will mention but three ways. First, the opinion-making elements–the universities and the media above all–are wholly corrupt and wholly opposed to everything we want, and increasingly even to our existence. (What else are the wars on “cis-genderism”–formerly known as “nature”–and on the supposed “white privilege” of broke hillbillies really about?) If it hadn’t been abundantly clear for the last 50 years, the campaign of 2015-2016 must surely have made it evident to even the meanest capacities that the intelligentsia–including all the organs through which it broadcasts its propaganda–is overwhelmingly partisan and biased. Against this onslaught, “conservative” media is a nullity, barely a whisper. It cannot be heard above the blaring of what has been aptly called “The Megaphone.”
Second, our Washington Generals self-handicap and self-censor to an absurd degree. Lenin is supposed to have said that “the best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves.” But with an opposition like ours, why bother? Our “leaders” and “dissenters” bend over backward to play by the self-sabotaging rules the Left sets for them. Fearful, beaten dogs have more thymos.
Third and most important, the ceaseless importation of Third World foreigners with no tradition of, taste for, or experience in liberty means that the electorate grows more left, more Democratic, less Republican, less republican, and less traditionally American with every cycle. As does, of course, the U.S. population, which only serves to reinforce the two other causes outlined above. This is the core reason why the Left, the Democrats, and the bipartisan junta (categories distinct but very much overlapping) think they are on the cusp of a permanent victory that will forever obviate the need to pretend to respect democratic and constitutional niceties. Because they are.
[…]
The sacredness of mass immigration is the mystic chord that unites America’s ruling and intellectual classes. Their reasons vary somewhat. The Left and the Democrats seek ringers to form a permanent electoral majority. They, or many of them, also believe the academic-intellectual lie that America’s inherently racist and evil nature can be expiated only through ever greater “diversity.” The junta of course craves cheaper and more docile labor. It also seeks to legitimize, and deflect unwanted attention from, its wealth and power by pretending that its open borders stance is a form of noblesse oblige. The Republicans and the “conservatives”? Both of course desperately want absolution from the charge of “racism.” For the latter, this at least makes some sense. No Washington General can take the court–much less cash his check–with that epithet dancing over his head like some Satanic Spirit. But for the former, this priestly grace comes at the direct expense of their worldly interests. Do they honestly believe that the right enterprise zone or charter school policy will arouse 50.01% of our newer voters to finally reveal their “natural conservatism” at the ballot box? It hasn’t happened anywhere yet and shows no signs that it ever will. But that doesn’t stop the Republican refrain: more, more, more! No matter how many elections they lose, how many districts tip forever blue, how rarely (if ever) their immigrant vote cracks 40%, the answer is always the same. Just like Angela Merkel after yet another rape, shooting, bombing, or machete attack. More, more, more!
This is insane. This is the mark of a party, a society, a country, a people, a civilization that wants to die. Trump, alone among candidates for high office in this or in the last seven (at least) cycles, has stood up to say: I want to live. I want my party to live. I want my country to live. I want my people to live. I want to end the insanity.
“… charge the cockpit or you die.”
FiveThirtyEight: If the election were held Monday, Donald Trump would likely win.
Update.
Holy crap.
Your Trump Speech open thread.
The problem is, this speech seems believable and convincing, especially in a vacuum.
I'm scared.
— Sally Kohn (@sallykohn) July 22, 2016
Rassmussen: Trump 44%, Clinton 37%”
Via Drudge.
Support a fellow blogger — because it looks like a fun read! Trump the Press: Don Surber’s take on how the pundits blew the 2016 Republican race.
More — a review by Stephen Hayward.
From science to industry to academia, the governing class is crawling with incompetents, fraudsters, and fakes — and people are beginning to notice.
The Brexit vote, suggests analyst Aaron Renn, demonstrated that arrogant urbanites, seeing themselves as the exclusive centers of civilization, ignore those who live outside the “glamour zone” at their own peril.
h/t Jean
There’s a growing sense, not only in Great Britain, but in the US as well, that the elites, or the political class, or whatever you’d like to call them, are incompetent and have been leading us astray. And the response from elites is to call those criticisms illegitimate. Those doing the carping are assumed to be racists or nationalists, both of which, of course, are unpleasant, dirty types of people. Both the UK’s Leavers and the US’s Trumpers share some commonalities. Among them are skepticism over free trade and free immigration; concerns that elites dismiss as foolish and uneducated. And, of course racist.
It’s not working nearly as well as it used to.
Related.
Does the fact that London stock market now higher than it was pre-Brexit mean everyone has to STFU abt economic destructiveness of populism?
— Ann Coulter (@AnnCoulter) June 30, 2016